Traders hit additional charge for coal plant cost recovery | Inquirer News

Traders hit additional charge for coal plant cost recovery

/ 06:45 AM June 26, 2012

ILOILO CITY — A business group in Iloilo has criticized an order of the Energy Regulatory Commission (ERC) that allows a coal plant operator to charge an additional 32 centavos per kilowatt hour to recover P692.304 million in commissioning and testing costs.

The Iloilo chapter of the Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry (PCCI) said the additional charge is an added burden to consumers who have to pay one of the highest electricity rates in the country.

Joe Marie Agriam, PCCI-Iloilo president, said imposing higher electricity rate is “antiprogress” especially when officials and business groups are promoting the city and province of Iloilo as an investment destination.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This deters our move to make Iloilo attractive to investors and unwittingly will push investors toward neighboring cities which have lower electricity rates,” Agriam said.

FEATURED STORIES

The ERC in an order issued on Dec. 26, 2011 and released on June 1, granted the petition of the Panay Energy Development Corp. (PEDC) to collect P692.304 million in five years as part of uncollected expenses during its testing and commissioning stages from April to August last year.

The PEDC operates the $104-million 164-megawatts coal-fired power plant in La Paz District here. The coal plant supplies the bulk of the electricity to the Panay Electric Co. (Peco), the city’s lone power distributor.

Article continues after this advertisement

Agriam said consumers should not shoulder these expenses.

Article continues after this advertisement

“PEDC enjoys a tax holiday for five years as mandated by the (Board of Investments) so an increase for reason of recovering investment done during commissioning stage connotes greed at the public’s expense,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The PEDC has said that it was not increasing its rates but recovering expenses not covered by provisional rates implemented before the ERC approved its Electricity Power Purchase Agreement with Peco.

The city government will also appeal the ERC ruling. /INQUIRER

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: coal plant

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.