Palace wants Midas Marquez out | Inquirer News
ON TARGET

Palace wants Midas Marquez out

/ 11:28 PM June 06, 2012

Supreme Court administrator and spokesperson Jose Midas Marquez. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

After initiating the ouster of Chief Justice Renato Corona, Malacañang is eyeing Court Administrator Midas Marquez as its next target.

Marquez’s only “crime” was being closely identified with Corona.

Article continues after this advertisement

Presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda hinted that  Marquez could be removed from his post because of  a supposedly leaked World Bank (WB) report that he mishandled a $21.9-million WB loan to the high court for its Judicial Reform Support Project.

FEATURED STORIES

What the Palace didn’t say was that both the WB and the Supreme Court are still reconciling the expenditures of the $21.9-million loan.

In other words, how could Malacañang say Marquez  misappropriated the loan when the auditing on how the loan was spent is not yet finished?

Article continues after this advertisement

The Supreme Court justices— and not Malacañang—should make Marquez answerable for the loan’s expenditures, if ever he is liable.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Palace is clearly infringing into the internal affairs of the high court.

Article continues after this advertisement

* * *

Supreme Court insiders tell me Marquez is one of their most efficient court administrators.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court administrator, who receives complaints against Court of Appeals justices and lower court magistrates, is a very powerful position.

Marquez, I am told, has never abused the powers that come with his position.

Many of his fellow lawyers envy him  because they consider him too young for his position.

* * *

There ought to be a law against airlines that charge  its passengers exorbitant fares.

I booked  a Zest Air flight to Marinduque on June 2, and was charged P9,400 for a round-trip ticket that would be used a week later.

The P9,400 fare  charged by Zest Air for a flight to an island 25 minutes from Manila was ridiculous.

It’s P400 less than the fare charged by Philippine Airlines for a round-trip ticket—P9,800—to Davao City which is 1 1/2  hours from Manila.

So I put off buying the ticket because I thought I would just take  a bus to Lucena City and then a ferry to Marinduque, an island-province in Southern Luzon.

But then I found that the trip by land and sea to Marinduque takes hours, and so I finally  decided to take Zest Air, the only airline servicing the Manila-Marinduque route.

And you know how much I was being charged after one day? P10,200 for a round-trip flight!

Again, I had second thoughts about  paying an exorbitant fare for a 25-minute flight, so I postponed buying the ticket.

But for the third  and last  time I decided to take the Zest Air flight because I didn’t want a long trip by land and sea.

You know how much Zest Air charged me for the round-trip ticket four days before I use it?

I was told the ticket would cost me P14,870!

In a matter of a few days, Zest Air increased its fare to Marinduque by 54 percent.

If that’s not air-highway robbery, I don’t know what is.

* * *

The owner of Zest Air is the same owner of a company that makes the popular Zest-O orange drink.

Many years ago, Zest-O became notorious because a gang used it to dupe unsuspecting bus passengers.

Members of the gang would sell Zest-O aboard buses plying Edsa and other routes.

When passengers bought the drink,  they would be charged an exorbitant price.

If a passenger complained about  the price—as much as 100 to 200 percent of the  original price—the gang would use its coercive power,  showing its strength in numbers.

The passenger could not do anything but pay the price  for fear of getting mobbed.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

I am just wondering if the Zest-O gang’s modus operandi—which the  manufacturer of the beverage, of course, disowned—was eventually adopted by Zest Air.

TAGS: Government, Judiciary, Politics, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.