House asked to probe SC ruling favoring commercial fishers
‘FAR-REACHING CONSEQUENCES’

House asked to probe SC ruling favoring commercial fishers

/ 05:50 AM January 31, 2025

Probe SC ruling favoring commercial fishers

INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — Opposition lawmakers have asked the House of Representatives to look into the “adverse impacts” of a recent Supreme Court ruling allowing commercial fishing in municipal waters.

ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro, Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas, and Kabataan Rep. Raoul Manuel filed on Jan. 28 House Resolution No. 2202 asking the committee on aquaculture and fisheries resources to look into the matter.

Article continues after this advertisement

The resolution was prompted by the Supreme Court decision in August 2024 regarding a ruling of the Malabon Regional Trial Court allowing Mercidar Fishing Corp. to fish within municipal waters and nullifying some provisions of the Fisheries Code.

FEATURED STORIES

The Malabon court allowed commercial fishing in municipal waters deeper than seven fathoms (12.8 meters), while the high tribunal rejected the petition for review of the Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR) because of a tardy pleading.

Earlier this month, BFAR asked the high court to remand the case to the Malabon court because of its “far-reaching consequences” for resource management, environmental protection, and the welfare of affected communities.

Article continues after this advertisement

Affected parties across the country, including towns with large constituents of fishers, have sought leave to intervene in the case, including the towns of Espinosa in Cebu and Del Carmen in Surigao del Norte, because of their constituents and the environment.

Article continues after this advertisement

In seeking an inquiry, the Makabayan bloc said the ruling would “further legitimize the monopolization and corporate plunder of traditional fishing grounds, leading to the eventual marginalization of small-scale and artisanal fisherfolk.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“The 15-kilometer municipal waters reserved for municipal fishers is merely two million square km, or only 15 percent of Philippine waters,” the proposed House resolution read.

“This entails that allowing commercial fishers to access the municipal waters would further shrink the reserved waters for small-scale fisherfolk to 2 percent,” it said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It is the mandate of the Philippine Constitution and the government to protect the livelihoods of small-scale and artisanal fisherfolk, ensure food security, and preserve Philippine marine biodiversity,” it added.

The 1987 Constitution states that subsistence fisherfolk have “preferential use and access” to municipal waters.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: commercial-scale fishing, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.