NCIP, Baguio agree to repeal Ipra exclusion of Ibaloys
TECHNICAL WORKING GROUP FORMED

NCIP, Baguio agree to repeal Ipra exclusion of Ibaloys

/ 05:04 AM January 16, 2025

SENSE OF COMMUNITY In this photo taken on Aug. 9 last year, Ibaloy families in Baguio City celebrate the World Indigenous Peoples Day as they gather to talk about community issues whilethey share meals and enjoy cultural presentations.

SENSE OF COMMUNITY In this photo taken on Aug. 9 last year, Ibaloy families in Baguio City celebrate World Indigenous Peoples Day as they gather to talk about community issues while they share meals and enjoy cultural presentations. —Neil Clark Ongchangco

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines — Baguio officials and the agency promoting indigenous Filipino rights have agreed in principle to remove restrictions in the 1997 Indigenous Peoples Rights Act (Ipra, or Republic Act No. 8371) that exclude the city’s Ibaloys from securing ancestral land titles.

But how to fulfill that would have to be studied by a technical working group, which was also formed in a resolution passed by the city council and the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) on Tuesday during their first joint session here.

Article continues after this advertisement

NCIP commissioners led by chair Jennifer Pia Sibug-Las and the majority of the Baguio councilors, led by Mayor Benjamin Magalong and Vice Mayor Faustino Olowan, convened to discuss the full impact of Ipra’s Section 78 which three recent Supreme Court rulings cited when it nullified Certificates of Ancestral Land Title (CALTs) granted to Baguio Ibaloy families dating back to 2010.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: SC final ruling: Baguio excluded from ancestral land titling

Section 78 states: “The City of Baguio shall remain to be governed by its Charter, and all lands proclaimed as part of its townsite reservation shall remain as such until otherwise reclassified by appropriate legislation.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The SC decisions issued in 2019, 2022, and 2023, and a July 2024 Baguio Regional Trial Court decision all say the NCIP does not have authority to grant CALTs here because of this special clause. The NCIP last year heeded the high court by freezing ancestral land processing in the summer capital, angering Ibaloys and indigenous rights advocates.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Councilor Jose Molintas, an Ibaloy human rights lawyer, Section 78 discriminates against Baguio’s Ibaloy dwellers contrary to what Ipra is supposed to uphold and should be expunged.

Article continues after this advertisement

But fellow Ibaloy Councilor Peter Fianza, also a lawyer and a former city administrator, advised the group against reviving the constitutionality issues that had plagued Ipra immediately after it was signed into law by the late President Fidel Ramos.

Constitutionality

Former Justice Isagani Cruz and lawyer Cesar Europa had questioned Ipra before the SC for violating a constitutional provision that all Philippine resources are owned by the State, which is referred to as the Regalian Doctrine, but their petition was dismissed on Dec. 6, 2000, after the high court sitting en banc could not break a 7-7 tie in votes.

Article continues after this advertisement

Simplicia Hagada, NCIP ethnographic commissioner for Cagayan, also said that a straightforward amendment of Ipra in Congress to remove Section 78 might open it to tampering by interest groups that wanted it watered down.

Some NCIP commissioners instead suggested that the repeal of Section 78 could be achieved by amending Baguio’s modern charter.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Baguio City, Ibalois, Ipra, NCIP

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2025 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.