Prosecution sees no SC intervention on Corona verdict | Inquirer News

Prosecution sees no SC intervention on Corona verdict

/ 09:01 PM May 28, 2012

House lead prosecutor Niel Tupas Jr.

Lead prosecutor Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr. PHOTO BY INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines — The prosecution team does not see the possibility of the decision on Chief Justice Renato Corona’s impeachment trial being brought to the Supreme Court for intervention.

Lead prosecutor Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr. maintained on Monday that the Senate has since Day 1 of the trial insisted that it had the sole authority to try impeachable officers.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We are relying on that pronouncement. I think it will not reach that point,” he said.

FEATURED STORIES

He asked whether it was fair if the chief magistrate takes his case to his “home court” if he gets convicted on Tuesday.

To Ilocos Norte Representative Rodolfo Fariñas, although Corona has the “right to reject” the decision, the prosecution team also had the right to reject that move. “This is a continuing denial (and) lame excuses. He cannot get away this time,” Fariñas said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We’re begging them not to run to the Supreme Court anymore because we need a rest,” Farinas said in jest.

Article continues after this advertisement

House majority leader Neptali Gonzales II believes that if convicted, the chief justice might find himself deserted by more and more of his allies. “I don’t know if justices would get the nerve to side with him. He needs a restraining order to stop the judgement,” he said.

Although admittedly just speculating, Gonzales said that by the time senator-judges hand down a conviction, Corona will have no more allies.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: corruption, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.