City Hall presents convenio in court | Inquirer News

City Hall presents convenio in court

By: - Senior Reporter / @inquirervisayas
/ 08:11 AM May 24, 2012

CEBU city government  lawyers  accused a court sheriff of defying a Temporary Restraining Order against  the garnishment of City Hall deposits to pay  heirs of the Rallos family  P133 million as just compensation for a parcel of land.

The accusation came as City Hall lawyers presented before the Court of Appeals a “convenio” or compromise agreement that dates back to the 1940s to prove their stand that the barangay Sambag II lot was donated by the owners and not expropriated from them.

Lawyer Jerone Castillo said court sheriff Eugenio Fuentes is continuing the threat of garnishing City Hall’s funds  in SM Prime Holdings Inc. SM Development Corp., and SM Investments Corp. despite the order barring him from seeking payment for  the road lot.

Article continues after this advertisement

The sheriff  denied ever serving the Notice of Garnishment earlier issued by  lower court against City Hall assets.

FEATURED STORIES

“When I received  the TRO, I didn’t do anything with regard to enforcing the lower court decision. I receive  my salary from the court so there is no reason for me to defy its order,” Fuentes told Cebu Daily News.

The SM group  is constructing one of its biggest malls in the South Road Projects, a 300-hectare reclaimed area of the city government.

Article continues after this advertisement

Justice Pampio Abarintos of the CA’s 18th division appeared  surprised by City Hall’s  revelation and asked for a written report.

Article continues after this advertisement

Another City Hall lawyer Janeses Ponce said the city  government needs to secure a writ of preliminary injunction from the court or else the Rallos heirs would  continue to go after city funds.

Article continues after this advertisement

The  administration of Mayor Michael Rama  is questioning the  earlier ruling by the Regional Trial Court which recognized the right to just compensation of the heirs of  Rev. Fr. Vicente Rallos for the supposed expropriation of the lot in barangay Sambag II.

Castillo explained in court why the city government only introduced the convenio now.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the document was  only discovered in 2011.

Associate Justice Gabriel Ingles, one of the members of the appellate court’s 18th division, asked lawyer Jonathan Gairanod, counsel of the Rallos family, if they are willing to admit the authenticity of the convenio.

Gairanod said the convenio wasn’t signed by a court judge.

But he admitted that one of his co-lawyers went to the RTC (formerly known as the Court of First Instance) Branch 5 to look for  the convenio.

“The document is found in the records of the court. There is no question with regard to its authenticity,” said Ponce.

He said that if former Cebu City mayor and now south district Rep. Tomas Osmeña tried hard to research  the case, the city wouldn’t  have been asked to pay for a lot that was actually donated by its owner.

“If he (Osmeña) did his homework, he would have seen that the lot was donated,” he said.

Ponce said they will give Osmeña all the documents and pleadings they will file with regard to the case so the congressman will not be issuing baseless statements.

“To satisfy Tomas, I’m giving him a copy of the petition and other pleadings. Otherwise, he will give his opinion on something he doesn’t know,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The Cebu city government already  paid P56 million to the Rallos heirs, something which Ponce said was unnecessary since the lot was donated by the family to the city.

TAGS: Rallos family

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.