SC voids warrantless arrest, clears man caught with gun

SC voids warrantless arrest, clears man caught with gun

/ 05:34 AM September 03, 2024

SC suspends work on Monday due to Enteng

Inquirer file photo

MANILA, Philippines — The Supreme Court has cleared a man of illegal possession of firearms and ammunition as it ruled the police had no justifiable reason to conduct a warrantless search against him after he tried to flee from a traffic violation.

In a 13-page decision promulgated in December 2023 and made public last week, the high court’s Second Division reiterated that a warrantless search cannot be justified when the suspect is apprehended for a traffic violation that is not punishable by imprisonment.

Article continues after this advertisement

The case stemmed from the case of Angelito Ridon who was accosted by the police in Makati City on Aug. 2, 2013, while he was driving a motorcycle.

FEATURED STORIES

Ridon was instructed to stop because the road he was about to enter was a one-way street. But instead of complying, he made a U-turn and drove down a different street.

Ridon then supposedly fell off his motorcycle when the police officers cornered him. As he got up, the police claimed he acted like he was reaching for something at his side.

Article continues after this advertisement

This led the police to draw their guns and train these on him. After conducting a search, they discovered a .38 caliber revolver and arrested him.

Article continues after this advertisement

In 2018, a regional trial court convicted Ridon of illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition.

Article continues after this advertisement

He appealed his conviction to the Court of Appeals, arguing that his right against unreasonable search and seizure was violated because the prosecution did not prove that he broke any traffic law or ordinance.

Accused’s argument

The appellate court upheld the lower court’s decision, prompting Ridon to file a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court.

Article continues after this advertisement

In the decision penned by Associate Justice Mario Lopez, the high tribunal ruled that the warrantless search and seizure of the firearm was invalid and as a result, Ridon must be acquitted.

It cited Rule 126, Section 13 of the Rules of Court, which allows for the search of a person lawfully arrested for dangerous weapons or items that could be used as evidence, even without a search warrant.

The Supreme Court noted that Ridon’s actions—his attempt to flee and his gesture as if drawing something from his waist—were the key factors that led to the decision of the police to arrest him.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“The Court decrees that the warrantless search on Angelito cannot be justified by his alleged traffic violation. A survey of jurisprudence will show that violating ordinances and regulations alone is insufficient to trigger a valid warrantless search and seizure, especially when the penalty does not involve imprisonment,” it said.

TAGS: SC, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.