Dam water not subject to wealth tax, SC rules
LANDMARK RULING

Dam water not subject to wealth tax, SC rules

/ 05:48 AM March 24, 2024

Angat Dam's water level drop slows down, says NWRB

FILE PHOTO: Angat Dam. Photo by Carmela Reyes-Estrope

The Supreme Court has ruled that dam water is an appropriated water already removed from natural resources, and thus, can no longer be subject to national wealth tax.

In a 28-page decision promulgated in October 2023 but made public only on Friday, the high court en banc said the Court of Appeals erred when it affirmed a local court’s ruling, which found the Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System (MWSS) was liable to pay the provincial government of Bulacan a share in the utilization and development of national wealth.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The moment that water from Angat River is already appropriated and impounded into the Angat Dam, it ceases to form part of natural resource,” the high tribunal said in a decision penned by Associate Justice Henri Jean Paul Inting.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: SC: Water concessionaires can’t pass corporate income tax to customers

The Supreme Court effectively granted the MWSS petition for review on certiorari as it reversed and set aside the 2008 decision of the appellate court in favor of Bulacan province.

The case stemmed from the complaint for specific performance/payment of national wealth share against MWSS filed by the provincial government of Bulacan through then Gov. Josefina Dela Cruz.

The Bulacan government said MWSS had been getting proceeds from the water resource of Angat Dam, which is located within its territorial jurisdiction.

It claimed MWSS must pay the local government a share of the utilization and development of national wealth.

However, the MWSS argued it was a nonprofit service utility created to provide water supply and a wastewater disposal system to Metro Manila and its neighboring provinces.

ADVERTISEMENT

The MWSS added water stored in Angat Dam did not necessarily come from Bulacan as it was simply stored in the catchment.

As a man-made structure, the dam, according to the MWSS, does not fall within the scope of national wealth that would entitle a local government like Bulacan to a share in the proceeds derived from its utilization and development.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court, water

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.