‘Walk out’ mars Maguindanao massacre trial | Inquirer News

‘Walk out’ mars Maguindanao massacre trial

Andal Ampatuan Sr. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — Lawyers of the accused in the Maguindanao massacre trial left the courtroom when the prosecution panel presented a witness Wednesday morning at a Quezon City regional trial court, a court staff said.

Out of respect for the court, defense lawyers led by Sigfreid Fortun manifested their desire to step out of the court room during the testimony of witness Eliseo Gollago and Quezon City Regional Trial Court Judge Branch 221 Jocelyn Reyes allowed them to leave.

Article continues after this advertisement

Fortun told the court that Gollago’s testimony had nothing to do with their clients Andal Ampatuan Sr., and Zaldy Ampatuan, the primary accused in the massacre.

FEATURED STORIES

Reyes appointed Public Attorney Laquindab Marohombrosar as “counsel de officio’’ for one of the accused Omar Kayansang, who was represented by lawyer Paris Real, when Real decided to leave with Fortun and the other defense lawyers.

Kayansang was not present in Wednesday’s proceedings.

Article continues after this advertisement

Real left the room, with Fortun and company to avoid listening to Gollago’s testimony, despite a reminder from the judge that Gollago’s testimony was relevant to the charges against his client, Kayansang, one of the accused.

Article continues after this advertisement

Gollago was the owner of a funeral parlor where 13 cadavers were embalmed.

Article continues after this advertisement

Gollago testified that he found the cellular phone hidden by one of the victims, lawyer Cynthia Oquendo-Ayon, in her underwear, which supposedly contained text messages she sent moments before she was killed.

Marohombsar later declined the court’s appointment.  “I have to recuse because his (Kayansang’s) counsel has manifested that he is waiving his appearance,” Marohombsar said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Assistant State Prosecutor Olivia Torrevillas chided the move of Real to walk out, saying “the right to counsel is personal to the accused.”

“The accused (is the only one who) can waive this right, not the counsel. He cannot do that,” Torrevillas added.

Real replied,  “She  (referring to Torrevillas) is the lawyer of the government, not the lawyer of Kayansang.”

Torrevillas had argued that Gollago’s testimony would be important to prove a conspiracy among the Ampatuans and their henchmen to kill 57 people in a remote road in a Maguindanao town on Nov. 23, 2009.

Torrevillas explained Gollago was listed in the February 14 pre-trial order because his name was only brought up by another prosecution witness during a hearing back in January.

When the hearing resumed in the afternoon, Assistant Prosecutor Dana Gomez told the court that Philippine Army Colonel Randolph Cabangbang could not appear in court to testify on the 176 pages of report submitted on Dec. 12, 2009 to then president Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The documents were the confidential reports about the military’s investigation of the massacre.

TAGS: Ampatuan, press freedom

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.