About time, transport groups say of PUV modernization | Inquirer News

About time, transport groups say of PUV modernization

NO ENTRY Antiriot police block the protest caravan of Manibela and Piston, transport groups who have gone to the Supreme Court to question the legality of the government’s modernization program for public utility vehicles (PUVs), on España Boulevard, Manila. PUVs not yet consolidated into cooperatives or corporations will be deemed illegal after Jan. 31.— RICHARD A. REYES

NO ENTRY | Anti-riot police block the protest caravan of Manibela and Piston, transport groups who have gone to the Supreme Court to question the legality of the government’s modernization program for public utility vehicles (PUVs), on España Boulevard, Manila. PUVs not yet consolidated into cooperatives or corporations will be deemed illegal after Jan. 31, 2024. (Photo by RICHARD A. REYES / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

MANILA, Philippines — The government’s controversial public utility vehicle modernization program (PUVMP) on Wednesday received renewed support from major national transport groups, which cited their personal experiences in modernizing their fleet.

During a press conference with Transportation Secretary Jaime Bautista, leaders from transport groups dubbed the “Magnificent Seven” said the implementation of the PUVMP was long overdue, stressing that commuters would vastly benefit from the program.

Article continues after this advertisement

They were composed of Pasang Masda, Alliance of Transport Operators and Drivers Associations of the Philippines, Alliance of Concerned Transport Organizations, Federation of Jeepney Operators and Drivers Association of the Philippines, Stop and Go Transport Coalition, Liga ng Transportasyon at Operators sa Pilipinas, and UV Express National Alliance of the Philippines.

FEATURED STORIES

Pasang Masda’s national president, Obet Martin, said the PUVMP was focused on serving commuters by providing safe and convenient public transport.

“We are all supporting a very orderly and very good program of the government. [The PUVMP] will bring about safe travel for our passengers and [bring] convenience to their journey. They’re in a modern vehicle, which they have long been aspiring for,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Bautista said he respected the rights of those opposed to the program but added that the government remains open to dialogues even after the Jan. 31 deadline. The government has said that after the end of the month, it will go after those who fail to consolidate their franchises, one of the requirements under the PUVMP.

Article continues after this advertisement

Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel III, for his part, vowed to assist PUV drivers and operators who were against modernization. He earlier called for the program’s indefinite suspension, saying the government was not ready to implement it and that stakeholders should have been consulted.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator said he would meet with PUV drivers and operators soon to discuss the issue and their plight.

“I want them to brief, educate us about the real situation. I want to get insights on what has been actually happening on the ground,” Pimentel said. Meanwhile, Bayan Muna chair Neri Colmenares said that his group would counter the Office of the Solicitor General position, which earlier called for the dismissal of the temporary restraining order petition filed by Piston and other groups against the PUVMP.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: public utility vehicles, PUV modernization program, transport groups

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.