US vetoes Security Council resolution calling for Gaza ceasefire | Inquirer News

US vetoes Security Council resolution calling for Gaza ceasefire

/ 07:01 AM December 09, 2023

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres attends a United Nations Security Council meeting

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres attends a United Nations Security Council meeting about his invoking Article 99 of the United Nations charter to address the humanitarian crisis in the midst of conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas at the UN headquarters in New York City, U.S., December 8, 2023. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

United Nations, United States — The United States on Friday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution that would have called for an immediate ceasefire in the intense fighting between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

Washington dashed a growing clamor for an immediate ceasefire that had been led by UN chief Antonio Guterres and Arab nations.

Article continues after this advertisement

American envoy Robert Wood said the resolution was “divorced from reality” and “would have not moved the needle forward on the ground.”

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Israel ‘appreciates’ PH abstention from UN’s Gaza ceasefire resolution

He attacked the resolution’s sponsors, criticizing them for rushing it through and leaving the call for an unconditional ceasefire unchanged.

“This resolution still contains a call for an unconditional ceasefire… it would leave Hamas in place able to repeat what it did on October 7,” Wood said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Guterres had convened an emergency meeting of the UN Security Council after weeks of fighting left more than 17,487 people dead in Gaza, mostly women and children, according to the latest toll from the health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The United Arab Emirates is deeply disappointed,” said the representative of the UAE which had sponsored the resolution.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Regrettably… this council is unable to demand a humanitarian ceasefire.”

As a permanent Security Council member, Washington can veto any resolution, while Britain, also a member, abstained on the vote, and the 13 other members voted in favor.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If you support it (this war) you are supporting crimes against humanity,” said the Palestinian representative to the UN Riyad Mansour. “This is a terrible day for the Security Council.”

Israel praised Washington’s veto, with the country’s UN envoy Gilad Erdan thanking “the United States and President Biden for standing firmly by our side.”

Ahead of the vote, Guterres had said that “the brutality perpetrated by Hamas can never justify the collective punishment of the Palestinian people.”

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a United Nations Security Council meeting

United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres speaks during a United Nations Security Council meeting about his invoking Article 99 of the United Nations charter to address the humanitarian crisis in the midst of conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas at the UN headquarters in New York City, U.S., December 8, 2023. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton

 ‘Complicit’ in slaughter

Vowing to destroy the Islamist movement, Israel has relentlessly bombarded Gaza and sent in tanks and ground troops since the war began on October 7 with unprecedented attacks by Hamas on southern Israel.

Those attacks left 1,200 people dead, Israel says.

Earlier this week, Israel called on the UN to investigate one aspect of the attack — alleged sexual violence by Hamas fighters against Israeli women.

“I unreservedly condemn those attacks. I am appalled by the reports of sexual violence,” Guterres said ahead of the vote.

“There is no possible justification for deliberately killing some 1,200 people, including 33 children, injuring thousands more and taking hundreds of hostages.”

Guterres deployed rarely-used Article 99 of the UN Charter to bring to the council’s attention “any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security.”

No one in his job had done this in decades.

READ: UN General Assembly calls for ‘humanitarian truce’ in Gaza

Guterres had sought a “humanitarian ceasefire” to prevent “a catastrophe with potentially irreversible implications for Palestinians” and the entire Middle East.

Russia’s deputy envoy to the UN, Dmitry Polyanskiy, said “our colleagues from the USA have literally before our eyes issued a death sentence to thousands, if not tens of thousands, more civilians in Palestine.”

Medecins Sans Frontiers said Security Council inaction made the body “complicit in the ongoing slaughter” while Human Rights Watch said “by continuing to provide Israel with weapons and diplomatic cover… the US risks complicity in war crimes.”

Several previous attempts to pass a resolution calling for a ceasefire were vetoed.

Vast areas of Gaza have been reduced to a wasteland. The United Nations says about 80 percent of the population has been displaced, facing shortages of food, fuel, water and medicine, along with the threat of disease.

“International humanitarian law includes the duty to protect civilians,” Guterres said.

His spokesman Stephane Dujarric said Guterres “remains determined to push for a humanitarian ceasefire.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Four draft resolutions had already been rejected in the weeks following October 7, for lack of sufficient backing, or because of Russian, Chinese or US vetoes.

TAGS: Israel-Hamas war, UN Security Council, United States

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.