Sara’s secret funds can be resuscitated in bicam – Pimentel
'ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN'

Sara Duterte’s secret funds can be resuscitated in bicam – Pimentel

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 11:58 AM November 10, 2023

Koko Pimentel warns that Sara Duterte's secret funds can be restored in bicam

FILE PHOTO: Senate Minority Leader Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III, during the marathon plenary session on Thursday, November 9, 2023. Voltaire F. Domingo/Senate PRIB

MANILA, Philippines — Senate Minority Leader Aquilino “Koko” Pimentel III is not ruling out the possibility that the controversial P650 million confidential funds of the Office of the Vice President (OVP) and the Department of Educations (DepEd) could be restored during the bicameral committee discussion.

On Thursday, Vice President Secretary Sara Duterte dropped the request for the P500 million confidential fund for OVP and another P150 million for DepEd, which she concurrently heads.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Sara Duterte gives up seeking P650M in secret funds

FEATURED STORIES

But anything can still happen when the 2024 budget bill reaches the bicameral level, Pimentel said Friday.

“’Yan ang katotohanan na hindi maganda sa bicam, na parang anything goes po dun. But theoretically speaking, the bicam has the power to introduce anything…” he explained to reporters in a Zoom interview.

Article continues after this advertisement

(That’s the truth that is not good in bicam as if anything goes there. But theoretically speaking, the bicam has the power to introduce anything…)

Article continues after this advertisement

“So tama po ‘yan,  theoretically speaking, pwedeng ma-restore,” he said.

(So that’s correct; theoretically speaking, it can be restored.)

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Castro says VP Sara decides to drop secret funds because of backlash

The opposition leader then called on everyone to continue monitoring the budget deliberations in Congress until the government’s proposed spending plan for 2024 is approved in the bicam and ratified by both chambers.

Pimentel, however, saw no reason why Congress should still debate Duterte’s confidential funds when she herself is no longer pursuing it.

“Parang it would be a waste of time to force an agency to receive a funding na ayaw nila. Why should we do that?” he asked.

“Eh ito sinabi na harapan namin eh, ‘Ayaw ko na ‘yan’. Huwag na kaming mag aksaya ng panahon na magdedebate kami na bigyan natin ‘yung tao na ayaw. We should not waste time anymore.”

(This was said right before us, “I don’t want that anymore.” Let’s not waste time debating whether we should give it to someone who doesn’t want it. We should not waste time anymore.)

Besides, Pimentel noted, both the Senate and the House of Representatives have already agreed to give the  OVP, DepEd, and other civilian government agencies zero confidential funds.

When the House approved its version of the proposed P5.768-trillion national budget next year, it removed the confidential funds of certain government civilian agencies, including OVP and DepEd.

The Senate committee on finance later adopted the House budget bill version.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Though it is “far-fetched” to still debate the same version on confidential funds, Pimentel reiterated that anything can happen in the bicam.

“Far-fetched, but of course anything can happen in Philippine politics, and that would be one of the biggest disappointments and one of the biggest political stories of the year kung mangyari ‘yan (if that happens),” the senator said.

TAGS: confidential and intelligence funds, Koko Pimentel, Sara Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.