Graft court to get more magistrates | Inquirer News

Graft court to get more magistrates

/ 03:31 AM April 23, 2012

Justice Secretary Leila de Lima

The Department of Justice (DOJ) has given its nod to a legislative measure that would increase the number of justices in the Sandiganbayan antigraft court.

In a position paper, Justice Secretary Leila de Lima agreed with Sen. Teofisto Guingona III, author of Senate Bill No. 3111, that the antigraft court needed more justices to ensure the speedy resolution of graft cases.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, De Lima said a study was needed to determine exactly how many additional judges would be needed.

FEATURED STORIES

Guingona has proposed a three-fold increase or the appointment of 30 more magistrates to the 14-member tribunal.

De Lima said the Senate must get the opinion of Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Francisco Villaruz and other justices of the antigraft court to determine the appropriate number of new magistrates.

Article continues after this advertisement

“While there is a need to increase the number of associate justices in the Sandiganbayan, a thorough study should be made to determine how many associate justices are still needed,” De Lima said.

Article continues after this advertisement

She said a study should also be conducted to see how many  Sandiganbayan divisions should be created for the Visayas and Mindanao.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the justice secretary objected to a provision in the bill which would allow the designation of only one justice—instead of three—to handle a case and receive evidence.

Since the Sandiganbayan is a trial court, De Lima said the presence of three justices during hearings was necessary “to enable them to render the right decision.”  Marlon Ramos

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: DoJ, Judiciary, Legislation, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.