State pension firms investing in Maharlika bill or 'any of its activities' can be held liable | Inquirer News

State pension firms investing in Maharlika bill or ‘any of its activities’ can be held liable

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 12:37 PM June 14, 2023

former Senate President Franklin Drilon warned those prohibited to invest in the projects of  the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) that they could be held liable if they invest in it or in any of its activities.

Former Senate President Franklin Drilon. Screen grab / Senate PRIB file photo

MANILA, Philippines — “What the Congress directly prohibits cannot be done indirectly.”

With this reminder on Wednesday, former Senate President Franklin Drilon warned those prohibited from investing in the Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) projects that they may face liability if they invest in it or any of its activities.

Article continues after this advertisement

Drilon pointed out that the recently approved MIF bill “explicitly prohibits” certain government-owned and -controlled corporations (GOCCs) like the Social Security System (SSS) and Government Service Insurance System (GSIS) from investing in the wealth fund.

FEATURED STORIES

“The intention is crystal clear. Funds held in trust by the government, through these GOCCs, cannot be invested in the MIF,” he said in a statement on Wednesday.

“The prohibition is absolute and leaves no room for ambiguity,” he stressed.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prohibition, he said, was clearly stated in at least two provisions of the bill —  Section 6, paragraph  2 and  Section 12.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, the government’s economic managers had a different take on the bill when they claimed SSS and GSIS could still infuse funds into projects funded by the MIF.

Article continues after this advertisement

The former justice secretary strongly disagreed with this opinion.

“What the Congress directly prohibits cannot be done indirectly,” according to Drilon. “Let’s avoid making pronouncements that undermine this prohibition and sidestep the intent of Congress.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator instead urged the government to “respect the boundaries and legislative intent established by Congress regarding the prohibition.”

He also warned that the Board of Directors of state-run pension firms could be held liable if they invest in the MIF or in any of its activities.

“The prohibition against state pension funds investment into MIF is there precisely to safeguard the integrity of the funds and protect the pension of the retirees,” he said.

“The provisions would protect public funds held in trust from undue exposure or risks associated with the establishments of a state-owned investment fund,”  added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The bill recently approved by Congress has yet to be transmitted to President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos for signature.

JPV/abc
TAGS: Drilon, fund, Maharlika, MIF, pension

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.