CA tells Zaldy Ampatuan to prove his case in court | Inquirer News

CA tells Zaldy Ampatuan to prove his case in court

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 03:35 PM April 18, 2012

BAGUIO CITY, Philippines—The Court of Appeals on Wednesday told detained former Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) governor Zaldy Ampatuan to prove his case in court as it dismissed his appeal to reinstate a Department of Justice (DoJ) resolution absolving him from the Maguindanao massacre case.

In a 16-page resolution, the appeals court Special Former Eleventh Division through Associate Justice Noel Tijam said Ampatuan has enough opportunity to prove his innocence in court.

“The trial is still ongoing and petitioner is neither barred nor denied the right to foist whatever valid defense he has. For the entire duration of the trial, he has ample opportunity to confront and discredit the witnesses against him,” Tijam said.

Article continues after this advertisement

In November last year, the appeals court dismissed the bid of Ampatuan to avoid indictment in connection with the massacre.

FEATURED STORIES

The appeals court said then Justice Secretary Alberto Agra did not commit a grave abuse of discretion when he issued his May 5, 2010, resolution reinstating Ampatuan as a primary accused in the multiple murder case.

The assailed resolution reversed Agra’s own April 16, 2010, order absolving Ampatuan of any complicity in the Nov. 23, 2009, massacre allegedly orchestrated by his then powerful clan.

Article continues after this advertisement

In its recent ruling, the appeals court explained that to order the DoJ to conduct a reinvestigation on the case “would cause a grave injustice both to the prosecution as well as to the defense.” It added that it is not empowered to dictate upon the DoJ how a preliminary should be conducted.”

“The search for the truth must be hastened, once and for all so that the guilty will be punished and the innocent will be exonerated without delay,” the appeals court added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Court of Appeals

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.