Binay explains why she abstained from crucial Maharlika bill voting | Inquirer News

Binay explains why she abstained from crucial Maharlika bill voting

By: - Reporter / @BPinlacINQ
/ 06:02 PM June 01, 2023

Senator Nancy Binay explains why she abstained from crucial Maharlika bill voting.

Senator Nancy Binay (File photo by Bibo Nueva España/Senate PRIB)

MANILA, Philippines — Senator Nancy Binay chose silence and avoided taking a definitive stand when Senate was holding a decisive vote on the controversial Maharlika Investment Fund (MIF) bill.

Binay on Thursday explained why she decided to abstain from voting on the contentious proposal when the chamber decided on it early Wednesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sinuri po natin at tinimbang—ngunit sadyang kulang. (We studied it and weighed it, but it simply fell short.),” she said in a statement.

FEATURED STORIES

The lawmaker recalled months-long deliberations and revisions done on the MIF bill just left her with more questions than answers.

“I do understand the need to come up with something different to jolt and jumpstart our economy, and I, likewise, see the need to create fresh income sources to generate long-term economic growth and create jobs for our people. I just cannot turn a blind eye on development and say no,” she said.

But Binay observed there was still a lack of balance on the content of the MIF bill.

“I found no compelling reason either to say, ‘Yes, the MIF is a better medicine for the country.’ Or deny the fact that the risks are far greater than its claimed benefits,” she said.

Binay said the proposal failed to prove itself as a measure that would promote the interests of the Filipino people and safeguard the funds that need protecting.

“Personally, I have concerns about the Maharlika Investment Fund not falling within the necessary operational safety nets and parameters. We don’t want the ‘Big If’ in the Maharlika Fund to be dragged [into] the ‘Big Unknown,’” she said.

ADVERTISEMENT

The senator also underscored the duty of elected officials “to set the highest premium in safeguarding the interest of the people we serve.”

“For all these reasons, I decided to abstain while hoping that the MIF would live up to its claim as a tool for economic development. Let not the MIF be a ‘Big Mistake,’” she warned.

Despite the fierce pushback from critics questioning the need and timing of the measure, an overwhelming number of 19 senators still voted in favor of MIF bill.

Opposition Senator Risa Hontiveros rejected the proposal, while Binay abstained.

Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel III, Senator Francis Escudero, and presidential sister, Senator Imee Marcos, were not present on the floor to cast their votes.

The three lawmakers had previously raised concerns on the controversial MIF bill.

MIF bill, which had been certified as urgent by President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr., secured the approval of Congress in just a few months since the proposal first came to light.

Now, it’s up to the Chief Executive to decide the fate of the proposed MIF – which he once claimed to be his brainchild.

RELATED STORIES:

How did senators vote and eventually approve Maharlika bill?

Congress OKs Maharlika bill without pensions as funding

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Marcos says Maharlika Fund is his idea

APL
TAGS: Maharlika, MIF, Senate

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.