Deinfluencing, or the art of negative reviews

Woman using a smart phone. STORY: Deinfluencing, or the art of negative reviews

WASHINGTON — Looking straight into the camera, Valeria Fride holds up a tube of lip gloss. But instead of saying how amazing it is, the young brunette trashes it as “so sticky” and “really expensive,” with not enough color.

“It just didn’t do it for me,” the 23-year-old concludes.

Welcome to the art of deinfluencing, one of the latest trends on TikTok, in which influencers tell you what not to buy. As of early April, the hashtag had more than 430 million views on the wildly popular video-sharing app.

“It’s an honest version of what we see every day on social media,” Fride tells Agence France-Presse (AFP).

If you venture onto TikTok, you can find all kinds of videos about which soaps not to buy because they’re too pricey, or which dumbbells not to buy if you’re just a beginner with using weights.

Some have cast deinfluencing as a response to soaring inflation, or even an anticonsumerist movement—basically, don’t buy things that are not worth your money. “Do you really need 25 different perfumes?

Are you really going to use them all?” said a TikTok user in a video with the hashtag. But others say influencers are doing the same thing as before, with a slightly more palatable name. Indeed, influencers are everywhere on social media.

They make short, catchy videos promoting everything from mascara to tea to sneakers to video games—all for a tidy fee.

In theory, criticizing products would run counter to their business model.

Who would pay for that? Fride admits that at first, she was “really scared” how certain brands would respond to her new tactics. When one of her videos went viral, she says she told her mother: “I hope they don’t hate me.”

But it ultimately led to offers of new partnerships with companies who appreciated her negative reviews for their rivals. For Fride, it’s a sign that companies “want a more nuanced review.”

Responsible consumption

Jessica Clifton, a 26-year-old American influencer, explains that the deinfluencing trend rang true for her.

A few years ago, she became aware of the impact her conspicuous consumption—new clothes virtually every day in separate packaging, endless varieties of foundation makeup, a plethora of lipsticks—was having on the environment.

“I don’t even know how to use makeup,” Clifton told AFP, adding that she realized she owned 56 pairs of shoes. “I was like, ‘Oh my God, how did I get here?’” Clifton opened a new TikTok account dedicated to responsible consumption.

So she was thrilled when deinfluencing took off.

Authenticity

But she says she’s disappointed that the trend quickly became about “buy this, not that” instead of curbing overall consumption, and about users simply trying to get new followers.

For Americus Reed, a professor of marketing at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business, influencers are “no longer seen as authentic” by the public, which knows they are being paid to promote products. A deinfluencer, at least for now, is seen as more honest.

“That’s a way to stand out,” Reed says, while admitting that in the end, “a deinfluencer is still an influencer.”

RELATED STORIES

Mainstream media still chief source, but influencers gain role in discourse

Fake news sources: 58% say social media influencers spread false info

PH social media teems with bogus medical posts

Read more...