'Too big to fail:' Hontiveros, Gatchalian worry over DBP-Landbank merger | Inquirer News

‘Too big to fail:’ Hontiveros, Gatchalian worry over DBP-Landbank merger

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 02:53 PM March 29, 2023

Two senators have cautioned government over its planned merger of two state-run banks, which they said would create a “super monopoly" or could result in a financial entity “too big to fail.”

PHOTO/IMAGE: Landbank Official, DBP logo / INQUIRER FILES

MANILA, Philippines —Two senators have cautioned the government that merging two state-run banks would create a “super monopoly” or a financial behemoth “too big to fail.”

On Tuesday, Finance Secretary Benjamin Diokno disclosed that the planned merger of the Land Bank of the Philippines (Landbank)  and the Development Bank of the Philippines (DBP) already got the approval of President Ferdinand  Marcos Jr.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Wednesday, Senator Risa Hontiveros advised the government to “proceed cautiously and prudently” with  the merger, which she said “would create the largest bank in the Philippines, and perhaps would result in a financial entity ‘too big to fail.’”

FEATURED STORIES

“One painful lesson from the 2008 Global Financial Crisis is that large banks are riskier, and tend to introduce more systemic risk into the financial system,” the senator said.

Besides, Hontiveros said that the two banks “carry out separate and distinct mandates,” with the DBP financing infrastructure, logistics, and commerce and the Landbank helping small farmers, fisherfolk, and agrarian reform recipients acquire land holdings.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have to understand exactly where the redundancies are and what efficiencies can be gained from this merger, and balance these against any risks that the merger may pose to the economy and financial system,” said the senator.

Article continues after this advertisement

“These two institutions have very different mandates and very different client bases. Bakit ipagsasama ang dalawang banko na magkaiba ang misyon at layon?”

Article continues after this advertisement

(These two institutions have very different mandates and very different client bases. Why merge these two banks with different missions and goals?)

“At the end of the day, what is this merger truly for? Bakit gagawin ito? Sino ba ang makikinabang dito? Certainly not the employees, whose jobs are suddenly at risk,” she further said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(At the end of the day, what is this merger truly for? Why is it being done? Who will benefit from it? Certainly not the employees, whose jobs are suddenly at risk.)

Hontiveros said she would file a resolution, urging the Senate “to safeguard the financial sector’s stability by exercising oversight over the proposed merger.”

Senator Sherwin Gatchalian, meanwhile, raised “serious concerns” over the planned merger as this, he said, would create a “super monopoly” that will have control over local government unit deposits.

“So kung masama ang serbisyo ng super monopoly wala silang choice. Kung mataas ang interest rate sa kanilang loans, wala silang choice. It’s bad for our local government units,” Gatchalian said in an interview  at the Senate on Tuesday,

(If the service provided by the super monopoly is bad, they don’t have other choices. If the interest rate on their loans is high, they won’t have any choice. This is not good for our local government units)

“I have concerns, very serious concerns,”  he later said, adding he  has yet to read the supposed benefits from the said merger.

RELATED STORIES:

Bongbong Marcos backs Landbank-DBP merger, says Finance secretary

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Landbank-DBP merger in the works

JPV/abc
TAGS: banks, DBP, Gatchalian, Landbank, Merger, Risa Hontiveros

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.