Charter change will disrupt national unity, recovery – Lagman | Inquirer News

Charter change will disrupt national unity, recovery – Lagman

/ 05:42 AM March 26, 2023

Edcel Lagman STORY: Charter change will disrupt national unity, recovery – Lagman

Albay Rep. Edcel lagman. (File photo by JAM STA ROSA / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

MANILA, Philippines — Legislators should take stock of business groups’ opposition to amending the Constitution because it would only disrupt economic recovery and cause division when national unity is most needed, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman said Saturday.

Lagman made the statement a day after six business groups issued a statement against amending the Constitution because of high financial costs and its potential impact on current reforms.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The opposition of six big business groups led by the Makati Business Club to charter change echoes the position of independent-minded members of the House against a constitutional convention to amend the 1987 Constitution,” Lagman said.

FEATURED STORIES

On Friday, the Makati Business Club, Financial Executives Institute of the Philippines, Filipina CEO Circle, Justice Reform Initiative, Philippine Women’s Economic Network, and the Women’s Business Council Philippines issued a joint statement that raised issues for the Senate to consider in tackling charter change.

The business groups cited high financial costs and the impact  on investor confidence and economic reforms as factors to be considered in deciding on the “potentially disruptive proposal at a time when the country may be poised to regain its economic momentum.”

‘Not timely’

Lagman agreed with the business groups that charter change by any mode “is not timely as the government has to address more pressing economic problems on poverty, inflation, and food security.”

“The recent statutes liberalizing the entry of foreign investments into the country should first be fully implemented without trifling with the Constitution,” said the independent opposition lawmaker, who was one of the handful who voted against Resolution of Both Houses 6 and its implementing bill, House Bill 7325.

He added that the high cost of a constitutional convention “can be better channeled to pro-people agenda and reforms.”

RELATED STORIES

Enrile opposes House charter change bill

Zubiri thinks charter change moves delayed 3 new laws

Anti-martial law group warns vs charter change: Now is not the time

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, charter change, constitutional amendments, Edcel Lagman

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.