House OKs charter change via constitutional convention | Inquirer News
VOTING 301-6

House okays charter change via constitutional convention

/ 05:35 AM March 07, 2023

House plenary hall. STORY: House okays charter change via constitutional convention

The plenary hall of the House of Representatives. (INQUIRER FILE PHOTO(

MANILA, Philippines — The House of Representatives on Monday approved on third and final reading Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) No. 6, which calls for a “hybrid” constitutional convention to amend or revise the Constitution.

Apart from the principal authors — notably Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez and Cagayan de Oro Rep. Rufus Rodriguez — the 301 lawmakers who voted for the resolution also asked to be included as its co-authors.

Article continues after this advertisement

That number of lawmakers made Monday’s plenary session one of the most well-attended in the 314-member chamber.

FEATURED STORIES

This is not even counting the six who voted against RBH 6 and the sole abstention by Negros Oriental Rep. Arnolfo Teves Jr.

The resolution sets an election for delegates to a constitutional convention (con-con) on Oct. 30, simultaneous with the barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan polls.

Article continues after this advertisement

Should that election push through, it would be a scene not witnessed by the country since Nov. 10, 1970, when delegates were elected to the 1971 Constitutional Convention which eventually drafted the 1973 Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

That charter became the legal basis of Ferdinand Marcos Sr.’s “constitutional authoritarianism,” as he himself defined his rule under martial law.

Article continues after this advertisement

What distinguishes the upcoming constitutional convention is that it would also be made up of 63 appointed delegates, selected by the House speaker and the Senate president.

RBH 6 said certain “economic provisions of the 1987 Constitution need to be revisited… so that the Philippines may become globally competitive.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Such constitutional reform has been identified by reputable businesses and economic groups as one of the key policy instruments that needs to be implemented,” the measure said further.

But at least two business groups have expressed reservations about the “costliness” of convening a Con-con, saying the provisions in question could be tackled by legislation or executive action.

The House went ahead anyway with its vote on Monday afternoon, with Majority Leader Jose Manuel Dalipe calling a caucus an hour before.

Romualdez later called for a picture-taking with the congressmen who approved the measure.

The six who voted against RBH 6 were Camarines Sur Rep. Gabriel Bordado Jr., Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas, ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro, Basilan Rep. Mujiv Hataman, Kabataan Rep. Raoul Manuel and Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Meanwhile, Davao City Rep. Paolo Duterte, who was not in the plenary vote, issued a statement on Monday saying: “This is to express our irresolution with the immediate approval of [the measure]. To reiterate, we are not in opposition [to it], but we suppose that it is not timely, our country is facing more pressing social and economic issues, like inflation and poverty, among others, [such] that we need to prioritize.”

RELATED STORIES

Charter change cost to hit P15 billion

Charter change not needed to get foreign investments – Marcos

Lawmaker bares ‘real’ charter change agenda

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, charter change, House of Representatives, Martin Romualdez, Rufus Rodriguez

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.