DA memo is cartel ‘smoking gun’ – Hontiveros | Inquirer News

DA memo is cartel ‘smoking gun’ – Hontiveros

By: - Reporter / @MRamosINQ
/ 05:36 AM March 02, 2023

Domingo Panganiban STORY: DA memo is cartel ‘smoking gun’ – Hontiveros

Agriculture Undersecretary Domingo Panganiban (Photo from the Department of Agriculture)

MANILA, Philippines — Senior Undersecretary Domingo Panganiban of the Department of Agriculture (DA) has practically admitted that certain high-ranking government officials were behind a cartel involved in sugar smuggling in the country, Sen. Risa Hontiveros claimed on Wednesday.

Hontiveros said a memorandum issued by Panganiban on Feb. 27 directing the Sugar Regulatory Administration (SRA) to issue clearances to a shipment of sugar from Thailand was the “smoking gun” evidence that a “government-backed” cartel had been allowed to bring in the agricultural commodity without the proper import permits.

Article continues after this advertisement

The senator had earlier exposed that a shipment of 260 freight containers filled with refined sugar aboard three vessels arrived at the Port of Batangas on Feb. 9, or six days before the SRA issued on Feb. 15 Sugar Order No. 6 authorizing the importation of 440,000 metric tons of the commodity to address the tight local supply.

FEATURED STORIES

“That’s the smoking gun,” Hontiveros told the Inquirer, referring to Panganiban’s letter to SRA Administrator David John Thaddeus Alba.

“By their own admission, in black and white, they were aware that shipments of sugar arrived in the country way before … the earliest date the validly imported supply … could reach our ports,” she pointed out.

Article continues after this advertisement

Already allocated

Under the law, Hontiveros said any shipment of imported sugar under SO 6 should arrive in the country not earlier than March 1.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Not only were they aware of those dubious shipments, they even wanted to clear them for release despite those shipments being obviously smuggled,” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Inquirer tried to get the side of Panganiban, but a staff member from his office said queries should be addressed to Assistant Agriculture Secretary Rex Estoperez. The Inquirer called Estoperez as well as Assistant Agriculture Secretary and spokesperson Kristine Evangelista, but both officials did not answer the calls.

In his memorandum, Panganiban confirmed Hontiveros’ information that 440,000 MT of sugar to be imported by the Philippines had already been allocated to three traders — All Asian Countertrade Inc. (240,000 MT), Edison Lee Marketing Corp. (100,000 MT) and S&D Sucden Philippines Inc. (100,000 MT).

Article continues after this advertisement

“As the saying goes, you catch a fish by its mouth. That is true even (in the) smuggling of sugar,” Hontiveros said. “It is outrageous to see the government seemingly facilitating and brokering the formation of a cartel and smuggling ring seeking to control our nation’s sugar supply.”

Blue ribbon probe

The opposition senator said the Senate blue ribbon committee, headed by Sen. Francis Tolentino, should immediately conduct an inquiry into what she described as “sugar importation fiasco 2.0.”

Tolentino’s panel previously led the chamber’s investigation into the failed attempt to import 300,000 MT of sugar without President Marcos’ approval in November last year. As concurrent agriculture secretary, the President sits as SRA board chair.

“The entire country is waiting for the Senate, through the Senate blue ribbon committee, to fulfill its obligation. We should not allow the DA to be an organizer of cartels,” Hontiveros said.

“We should not allow our agricultural processes to be defined by kickbacks, shady contracts, and corruption. If we do not act soon, prices of basic goods will remain high and in the end, consumers and their families will suffer the consequences,” she warned.

Hontiveros said Panganiban could not use a separate memorandum that Executive Secretary Lucas Bersamin issued on Jan. 13 and SO 6 as legal cover to justify the release of the sugar shipment, pointing out that the law required all imported commodities to secure permits and clearances from appropriate state agencies.

In that separate document, Panganiban said Bersamin had allowed the three trading companies to import sugar.

SRA role ‘diminished’

“We should not ignore this ‘smoking gun’ proof of government-sponsored sugar smuggling being coordinated at the highest levels of bureaucracy,” Hontiveros said.

“Since they had no proper permits, those shipments should be considered as the subject of large-scale agricultural smuggling,” she insisted.

Senate Minority Leader Aquilino Pimentel III, a lawyer, agreed with Hontiveros that the shipment should be considered “smuggled goods until proven to be legitimate.”

He noted the authorization for the sugar importation was “highly irregular” and only made the SRA “looks like it has no more use or role.”

“They have diminished the importance of the SRA,” Pimentel said.

The Senate minority leader also warned the public officials and other individuals responsible for the entry of the imported agricultural commodity.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“All involved should better be very careful as this is a highly irregular shipment or importation. All involved should follow their established protocols and procedures,” Pimentel said.

RELATED STORIES

Hontiveros: DA clearing release of imported sugar sans permit proves gov’t hand in smuggling 

Quimbo suspects cartels behind ‘artificial’ onion prices

PCC probes onion cartels

TAGS: Department of Agriculture, Domingo Panganiban, Risa Hontiveros, sugar importation

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.