Brosas: Con-con delegates to get P10,000 daily, but no money for aid? | Inquirer News

Brosas: Con-con delegates to get P10,000 daily, but no money for aid?

/ 09:34 PM February 27, 2023

Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas STORY: Brosas: Con-con delegates to get P10,000 daily, but no money for aid?

Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas. (Photo from her Facebook page)

MANILA, Philippines — A House bill calling for a constitutional convention to amend the Constitution wants to give each delegate an allowance of P10,000 daily, and yet there’s no money for financial aid for those suffering from the economic crisis.

Gabriela party-list Rep. Arlene Brosas raised this point on Monday at the hearing of the House Committee on Constitutional Amendments.

Article continues after this advertisement

She was referring to the contents of the approved committee report, which contains an unnumbered substitute bill.

FEATURED STORIES

“In the accompanying bill, it’s stated that P10,000 will be given each day to the delegates of the con-con. That’s almost the minimum wage of a worker in a whole month. So all in all, how much will be spent on this?” Brosas said in Filipino.

“There’s a P10,000 per diem that will be given while there are no funds for citizens seeking aid for their families in the face of rising prices and this crisis,” she added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The provision for the P10,000 daily allowance for “actual attendance” of the convention is contained in Section 8 of the unnumbered substitute bill.

Article continues after this advertisement

This means that a delegate present in all five sessions in a single week would get P50,000 for that week.

Article continues after this advertisement

The same section states that delegates will get “necessary traveling and lodging expenses” from their place of residence to the convention venue and back.

Authority to appoint delegates

Brosas also questioned the authority of the House speaker and the Senate President to appoint delegates who would join the constitutional convention, as stated in the revised consolidated bill

Article continues after this advertisement

“Where did this power come from? […] No appointing powers were given to the Senate president at House speaker under the current Constitution,” she said.

Brosas was referring to a provision in a similar bill, which if enacted, would implement Resolution of Both Houses (RBH) No. 6, which calls for a constitutional convention.

A provision in the substitute bill followed the proposal of former Supreme Court Chief Justice Reynato Puno for Congress to adopt a hybrid constitutional convention, which would have both elected and appointed delegates. This would ensure that political families would not dominate the convention, Puno said.

To ensure fairness, Puno suggested that the head of the legislative branch — not the president who heads the executive — would make the appointments.

Not an economic solution

Brosas also insisted that amending the Constitution would not solve current concerns.

“Mr. Chair, we are firm in our belief that amending or revising the Constitution will not directly address the urgent economic concerns of Filipino women and people,” she said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“If there’s something we should change, it is not the Constitution but the laws and regulations that go against our nationalist aspirations and the democratic spirit of the 1987 Constitution. We fear that we are repeating a dark side of our history by pushing through with this con-con accompanying bill,” she added.

RELATED STORIES

Ex-Chief Justice Puno suggests ‘hybrid constitutional convention’

House panel OKs substitute bill to implement con-con resolution

House panel OKs resolution proposing a constitutional convention

ATM
TAGS: constitutional amendments, constitutional convention

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.