For 'unhappy' South Koreans, building families is 'difficult' task | Inquirer News

For ‘unhappy’ South Koreans, building families is ‘difficult’ task

/ 05:22 PM January 03, 2023

Young South Koreans dread revival of work dinners as pandemic eases

People make a toast at a pub in Seoul, South Korea, October 11, 2016. REUTERS/Kim Hong-Ji

SEOUL — Na Kyung-won, a four-term lawmaker and the chief of the Presidential Committee on Ageing Society and Population Policy, said young Koreans are reluctant to get married and have children because their lives are “very difficult” with “no expectation that their lives will be any better and happier.”

Young Koreans living in a highly competitive society have low expectations for their futures, with the thought that they might not live happier lives than their parents. This growing negativity appears to have affected their decision to build a family, thus further dragging down the nation’s already stagnant fertility rate, Na told The Korea Herald. Na, a political heavyweight contending for the ruling party’s leadership in March, cited high youth unemployment and the rising cost of housing and child care as the other factors hindering childbirth in the country.

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwhile, warning lights are flashing red for the South Korean population. The average number of babies born to each couple was 0.81 in 2021, the world’s lowest for the past two years in a row, and the only nation with a number of less than one per couple. Over the past decade, the nation injected nearly 400 trillion won ($313 billion) to address the declining population issue, but failed to buck the trend.

FEATURED STORIES

“This gives us a task to alleviate (the issue) policy-wise, but also to approach the problem through social and cultural perspectives in order to bring about a change.”

A recent survey by the US polling agency Pew Research Center echoed her remarks. Six out of 10 Koreans responded that their children’s generation would be poorer than their parents’ generation, the highest since the survey was first conducted in 2013.

Article continues after this advertisement

Population decline began in 2020 for the first time, and the trend has continued for three consecutive years. From January to October last year, there was a natural population decrease of 95,879 people. The average number of babies born to each couple also decreased from 1.172 in 2016 to 0.81 in 2021 and 0.79 in the third of last year.

Article continues after this advertisement

To tackle the low birth issue, the Korean government spent 380.2 trillion won for 15 years between 2006 and 2020.

Article continues after this advertisement

However, Na said the state’s coffers aimed at tackling population decline have been spent “inefficiently.”

“By the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s standards, we spent less on directly related to childbirth, such as infertility and childcare,” she said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The OECD average expenditure is 2.4 percent of gross domestic product, but South Korea only spends 1.4 percent, according to the committee head. The nation needs to “start bitterly reflecting” on its inefficient spending which has given no results, she added.

She is now “closely examining policies implemented by the Hungarian government.

Since 2019, the Hungarian government began offering married couples an interest-free ten million forint ($26,500) loan. For couples with one child in a five-year period, the interest on their loan is suspended forever and monthly repayments are halted for three years. The birth of a second child allows them a further three-year pause on repayments and they do not have to pay back the loans at all if they have three children.

This was the nation’s bold scheme to boost its lagging birth rate. Hungary’s average fertility rate was 1.49 children per woman compared to the European Union’s average of 1.59 in 2019.

“Considering South Korea’s GDP, we will have to give about 200 million won (for each couple) to have some effect,” she said.

Under the changed policies under the Yoon administration starting in January, 700,000 won per month is paid to families raising a child below 12 months and 350,000 won for a child below 24 months. The benefits will rise to 1 million won and 500,000 won, respectively, from 2024.

To boost the low birth rate, Na stressed that it is important to change young people’s perceptions of some social and cultural factors, such as career disruption or gender roles.

“The reason many couples are reluctant to have a child is that pregnancy and childbirth is a negative factor in their careers, including promotion and career disruption,” she said.

Company support for childbirth and child care should be mandatory, although it will take some time to make this a reality. Na will strive for public officials to change government policies first, and then urge large companies to follow. She recently met with leaders of the nation’s top conglomerates and urged them to adopt such child care-friendly policies.

Although it would take some to see drastic changes, the government is taking some steps toward changing company policies. It recently decided to increase the statutory parental leave period from one year to one year and six months, a measure that is pending approval in the National Assembly.

Gender inequality also plays a role in Korea’s low birth rate.

It is a common phenomenon that as the number of highly educated women increases, the birth rate falls in many countries. But when women with higher education face gender inequality from both society and their families, they are more hesitant to have a child, she said.

“In a country where gender equality is low ‘in society,’ women are still more interested in having a child if gender equality is good ‘in the family’,” she said.

Unfortunately, for women in Korea, “both gender equality in society and family are not good,” she said. In other words, women – who tend to face discrimination in many professional fields – also have to shoulder a greater burden for housework and child care at home.

The Global Gender Gap Report 2022 published by the World Economic Forum echoed her remarks. Gender equality in South Korea, Asia’s fourth-largest economy, was still at the bottom, ranking 99th out of 146 countries.

Face reality

Efforts to deter further population decline are necessary, but it is also time to accept the fast-changing demographic structure, she said.

South Korea is expected to become a super-aged society by 2025, with 20 percent of the population aged over 65. By 2035, 1 in 3 Koreans will be over 65, according to Statistics Korea.

In particular, the aging population is rapidly increasing as those from the baby boomer generation are now in their 60s. Korea’s baby boomers were those born between 1955 and 1963 after the Korean War (1950-53), accounting for about 9 million people.

“We used to only focus on raising the birth rate,” she said. “But now, policies need to change to both mitigate and adapt to the declining population.”

Having a child here used to be a sort of “investment” as they support their parents when they grow up. Now, things have changed. Having a child is only a “cost” and parents are “not ready for their old age” after investing money in their children. “If young people are well prepared for old age, they may feel less burdened about having a child.”

Currently, the government budget has been set as “6:4 or 7:3” in terms of weighting, to overcome the low birth rate and aging, respectively, putting more focus on low birth rate. However, “this needs to be more upside down,” she said.

The nation also needs to reflect on how it can extend the period and terms around the elderly workforce, she said.

“Instead of continuing to support them, we need to consider various solutions such as extending the retirement age or changing the wage system — from the current system in which you earn more the longer you stay — so that they can continue to work,” Na said.

“It is necessary to think about enhancing their economic capabilities and creating opportunities for them,” she said. “This is different from the issue of inserting money on them.”

Open immigration policy

It is also time to think about things that have been “taboo,” Na said, referring to embracing foreigners to tackle the declining population.

“Until now, our society has been very closed to immigration,” she said. “However, the economy is not sustainable if the population continues to shrink at this pace.”

For a sustainable Korea, the country needs to be more open about immigration, the committee head said. The nation needs to implement a policy that focuses on “accepting good human resources.”

The government announced last month that it would establish a policy system for a mid-to-long-term immigration policy to tackle the challenges of a declining population.

To attract foreign talent, employment-based visa requirements for foreign professionals hired by small- and medium-sized enterprises will be relaxed from five to three years. The annual quota for skilled foreign workers will also be expanded from 2,000 to 5,000 next year.

Tackling the declining population and aging society has been a major challenge for South Korea. The Presidential Committee on Ageing Society and Population Policy Committee was founded in 2003. The judge-turned-politician was appointed by President Yoon Suk-yeol to lead the committee in October last year.

The conservative heavyweight expressed her intent to run for the party’s leadership election to be held on March 8, and is currently ranked first in multiple suitability surveys from party supporters.

RELATED STORIES

Can kids grow up happy in Korea?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Does South Korea need a ‘loneliness minister’?

TAGS: Family, Population, Society, South korea

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.