Bicam to consolidate amendments from Senate, House in proposed 2023 budget | Inquirer News

Bicam to consolidate amendments from Senate, House in proposed 2023 budget

/ 02:24 PM November 25, 2022

Bicameral Conference Committee 1

Lawmakers from both the Senate and the House assemble at the Manila Golf and Country Club on Friday to convene the Bicameral Conference Committee that would tackle the proposed 2023 national budget. The committee is tasked to consolidate the House and Senate’s own versions, amid possible differences in adjustments and realignments. (Photo by Gabriel P. Lalu/ INQUIRER.net)

MANILA, Philippines — The Bicameral Conference Committee will face the huge task of combining the two versions of the proposed 2023 national budget, as the Senate made amendments worth P215 billion for programmed allocations and the House of Representatives moved around P77 billion.

In an interview after the bicameral conference committee started deliberating the proposed P5.268 trillion budget on Friday, Senator Sonny Angara and Marikina 2nd District Rep. Stella Quimbo confirmed the adjustments in the Senate and the House’s own versions of the General Appropriations Bill (GAB).

Article continues after this advertisement

“[…] Mayroong mga disagreeing provisions and I believe amounting to about P215 billion worth of increases in budget items,” Quimbo told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

(There are disagreeing provisions, amounting to about P215 billion worth of increases in budget items.)

Angara also confirmed that this is different from the P77 billion amendments made by the House.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Nasa gano’n, mga (It’s around) P200 billion […] Yes,” Angara added, after being asked if the over P200 billion amendments by the Senate differs from the one made by the House.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a follow-up interview, Quimbo confirmed to House reporters that the P215 billion adjustments made by the Senate may or may not include the House’s P77 billion changes, adding that the bicameral conference committee would thresh out these matters.

Article continues after this advertisement

Despite the differences, Quimbo remains confident that the two chambers of Congress can quickly combine the two GAB versions because of the Medium Term Fiscal Framework (MTFF).

The MTFF is a fiscal framework set by President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.’s economic managers, which indicates the administration’s policy direction for the duration of the Chief Executive’s term.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sa tingin ko naman mabilis na makaka-agree ang House at Senado dahil mayroon tayo — for the first time, inadopt natin ang Medium Term Fiscal Framework na ito ang naglalaman ng eight-point socio-economic agenda ng ating Pangulo,” Quimbo said.

(I think the House and the Senate can quickly agree on things because we have, for the first time, adopted a Medium Term Fiscal Framework that contains the eight-point socio-economic agenda of the President.)

“So ‘yon ang magiging guiding posts ng House at Senate and in the end ang maipapasa natin na version siyang pinakamagandang magsusuporta dito sa ating agenda,” she added.

(So these would be the guiding posts of the House and Senate, and in the end, what we would pass would be the best budget proposal that supports this agenda.)

READ: House OKs reso backing admin’s Medium-Term Fiscal Framework 

Angara also admitted that the lapses in the budget realignments might be due to some Senators basing their proposed amendments on the National Expenditures Program (NEP) sent in by the executive and not the GAB approved by the House.

“Malamang, hindi maiiwasan ‘yan, talagang kasi ‘yong minsan ang pinagbabasehan ng amyenda ng mga Senador ay ‘yong NEP pa, hindi nila alam na minsan nagagalaw na po ‘yon sa General Appropriations Bill, ayon kailangan i-discuss ‘yong mga gano’ng klase ng amendments,” Angara noted.

(Of course, we cannot avoid that, there are times when the basis of amendments suggested by Senators is the NEP, they do not know that sometimes, that item was already changed in the General Appropriations Bill, which means we need to discuss these amendments.)

Meanwhile, Angara also revealed that among the things discussed initially in the bicam is the intelligence fund allocations to several government offices — with Senator Risa Hontiveros moving that the changes made by the Senate regarding the confidential and intelligence funds be kept.

“Yes dahil nagsabi na si vice chair Hontiveros na sana manatili ‘yong amendment po ng Senado na nagrealign tayo ng ilang daang milyong pondo mula sa intelligence funds ng iba’t ibang ahensya na nilagay po — hindi naman natin tinanggalan ng pondo ‘yong ahensya, kundi nilagay lang natin sa kanilang tinatwag na MOOE o ‘yong Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses,” Angara added.

(Yes, because vice chair Hontiveros already asked that the amendments by the Senate, where we realigned some hundred million funds from the intelligence funds of different agencies — we did not remove the funds from the agency, we only allocated these to their MOOE or the Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses.)

Earlier, officials from both the House and the Senate expressed confidence that the proposed 2023 national budget would be ratified and signed into law before Christmas, with Angara stressing the need to sustain the momentum of early submissions by the executive and the House.

READ: Senate, House bicam conference on proposed 2023 budget starts

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: House, Senate leaders confident 2023 nat’l budget signed before Christmas

/MUF/abc
TAGS: 2023 budget, House, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.