Lawyers in drug case vs son of DOJ chief Remulla won't talk, cite sub judice rule | Inquirer News

Lawyers in drug case vs son of DOJ chief Remulla won’t talk, cite sub judice rule

/ 08:10 PM November 10, 2022
Lawyers in drug case vs son of DOJ chief Remulla refuse to talk citing sub judice rule

INQUIRER.net stock photo

MANILA, Philippines — Prosecution and defense lawyers refused to talk after Thursday’s hearing on the drug possession charges against the son of Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla, citing the sub judice rule.

Members of the press tried to get the side of lawyers for both sides, following the hearing of the drug case against Juanito Remulla III in Las Piñas City, but they declined to answer queries.

ADVERTISEMENT

To avoid prejudgment or trial by publicity, the court repeatedly reminded the parties to follow the sub judice rule. The rule prohibits counsel from commenting or disclosing specific essential components of the legal procedure.

The younger Remulla was arrested last October 11 after he was found in possession of around a kilogram of kush, estimated to be worth more than P1.3 million. Kush,  a hybrid of the marijuana plant, is also called high-grade marijuana.

FEATURED STORIES

The arrest happened after the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) conducted a controlled delivery operation.

Last November 4, Juanito pleaded not guilty to drug possession charges filed against him by the Las Piñas City Prosecutor’s Office. His father, who is chief of the Department of Justice, had vowed not to intervene in the case.

KGA/abc
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: court, DoJ, Drugs, kush, Remulla
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.