Saudi prince has immunity in Khashoggi killing lawsuit, say lawyers | Inquirer News

Saudi prince has immunity in Khashoggi killing lawsuit, say lawyers

/ 08:53 AM October 04, 2022

FILE PHOTO: Saudi Arabia's newly designated Prime Minister, Mohammed bin Salman speaks during his meeting in the Ministry of Defence in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Saudi Arabia’s newly designated Prime Minister, Mohammed bin Salman speaks during his meeting in the Ministry of Defense in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, September 27, 2022. Saudi Press Agency/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo

Lawyers for Saudi Arabian Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, facing a US lawsuit over the 2018 killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, told a court on Monday the crown prince’s appointment as prime minister last week ensured him immunity from prosecution.

Khashoggi was killed and dismembered by Saudi agents in the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in an operation which US intelligence believed was ordered by Prince Mohammed, who has been the kingdom’s de facto ruler for several years.

Article continues after this advertisement

The prince denied ordering Khashoggi’s killing, but acknowledged later it took place “under my watch.”

FEATURED STORIES

Last week his elderly father King Salman named him prime minister in a royal decree which a Saudi official said was in line with responsibilities the crown prince was already exercising.

“The Royal Order leaves no doubt that the Crown Prince is entitled to status-based immunity,” lawyers for the prince said in a petition requesting a federal district court in Washington dismiss the case, citing other cases where the United States has recognized immunity for a foreign head of state.

Article continues after this advertisement

US President Joe Biden, who fist-bumped the crown prince on a visit to Saudi Arabia in July to discuss energy and security issues, had told Prince Mohammed that he considered him responsible for Khashoggi’s killing.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said Prince Mohammed denied involvement and asserted those involved had been held to account.

Article continues after this advertisement

Khashoggi, who had criticized the crown prince’s policies in Washington Post columns, had traveled to the Saudi consulate in Istanbul to obtain papers he needed to marry Hatice Cengiz, a Turkish citizen.

The lawsuit was filed jointly by Cengiz and a human rights group founded by Khashoggi, and sought unspecified damages against the crown prince, known in the West as MbS. It also named more than 20 other Saudis as co-defendants.

Article continues after this advertisement

It charged that MbS, his co-defendants and others carried out a plot to “permanently silence Mr. Khashoggi” after discovering he planned to use the group as “a platform to espouse democratic reform and promote human rights.”

The court had asked the US Department of Justice to express a view on whether Prince Mohammed had immunity, setting an October 3 deadline for a response.

After the prince’s appointment as prime minister last week, the department said on Friday it was seeking a 45-day extension to prepare its response to the court “in light of these changed circumstances.”

On Monday, US District Judge John D. Bates granted the request for an extension but said absent compelling evidence, this would be the only extension he would allow.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The United States should file any statement of interest no later than November 17, Bates said in a court document.

RELATED STORIES:

A timeline of Saudi statements on the killing of Khashoggi

Saudis sentence 5 people to death for Khashoggi’s killing

Biden disputes Saudi account of Khashoggi murder discussion

TAGS: Saudi Prince, world news

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.