Gloria Arroyo's bill seeks to penalize political turncoatism | Inquirer News

Gloria Arroyo’s bill seeks to penalize political turncoatism

/ 12:27 PM August 04, 2022

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo

Gloria Macapagal Arroyo

MANILA, Philippines — A bill filed by Senior Deputy Speaker and Pampanga Rep. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo that seeks to reform political parties would restrict and penalize political turncoatism — or the practice of switching party lines after elections — if it is enacted.

Section 13 of Arroyo’s House Bill No. 488 or the Political Party Development Act of 2022 states that politicians who change their political party affiliation one year before and one year after any national elections would have forfeited the elective office they are running for or the post they have been elected for.

ADVERTISEMENT

The following penalties were placed under the said bill, which was filed last June 30:

FEATURED STORIES
  • Disqualification from running for any elective position in the next succeeding election immediately following the act of changing political party affiliation;
  • Disqualification from being appointed or from holding any position in any public or government office for three years after the expiration of the current term/ office;
  • Disqualification from assuming any executive or administrative position in the new political party; and,
  • Refund of any and all amounts received from one’s former political party, plus a twenty-five percent (25%) surcharge thereon

Section 14 of the bill states that: “Any citizen eligible to vote can file a petition before the Commission on Elections (Comelec) for the disqualification of any candidate if he or she has committed turncoatism.”

The practice of turncoatism after elections has been prevalent in the Philippine political setting.  It happened during the victory of the late former president Benigno Aquino III in 2010, when a lot of officials jumped to his Liberal Party (LP).

After former president Rodrigo Duterte won in 2016, a lot of the LP members moved to PDP-Laban, which was the political party of the winning president. Currently, several officials within the House of Representatives also transferred from other parties to Lakas-CMD, the party headed by Arroyo and Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez.

However, this is not the first time that a bill developing the country’s political party was filed in Congress.  In the 17th Congress, a similar measure penalizing turncoatism and also increasing the allowable expenditure per candidate to P20 was filed.

Former Senate minority floor leader Franklin Drilon also filed a bill containing provisions against turncoatism at the start of the 18th Congress, but both versions were not enacted.

The late Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago also filed a similar measure in 2011 during the 15th Congress, citing in her explanatory note that the removal of the prohibition on turncoatism in the 1986 Constitution resulted in it being “very rampant” that “(blurred) the Philippine political party system.”

ADVERTISEMENT

READ: House bill imposes heavy penalties on ‘political butterflies’

But aside from tackling the issue of turncoatism, Arroyo’s proposal also tackles the increase of the amount a candidate or party can spend for each voter to P20, subject to review every three years based on the consumer price index.

The bill covers the accreditation of political parties nationwide, including the establishment of a State Subsidy Fund that would help augment accredited parties’ operating funds.

To be accredited to receive part of the fund, the bill says that the following conditions must be met by the political party:

  • Political representation, consisting of the incumbent pre-members of Congress, Governors, and City Mayors;
  • Organizational strength and mobilization capability, which may include the number of political chapters, organizations nationwide, and number of permanent members of the party paying their dues; and
  • Performance and track record of the party, which may include its performance in the past elections and its ability to field candidates in the coming elections

The State Subsidy Fund, however, can only be used for programs like operating expenses such as hiring staffers and setting up of headquarters; traveling expenses of an accredited party’s candidates in the course of campaigns; information dissemination about the party’s goals; production of campaign and propaganda materials; and other expenses under Section 102 of the Omnibus Election Code.

If enacted, five percent of the fund will be given to Comelec for voter education.  At least 30 percent of the fund would be given to accredited political parties represented in the Senate and 65 percent to parties inside the House of Representatives.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The Commission on Audit will be assigned to check the financial transactions involving the said State Subsidy Fund.

EDV
TAGS:

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.