Lawmaker bats for mandated child support; wants 'deadbeat parents' punished | Inquirer News

Lawmaker bats for mandated child support; wants ‘deadbeat parents’ punished

/ 05:40 PM July 11, 2022
The photo shows the plenary of the House of Representatives where a lawmaker filed a bill that seeks to mandate child support and punish neglectful parents who skip them

Plenary Hall of the House of Representatives. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO / GRIG C. MONTEGRANDE

Updated @ 1:22 a.m., Tuesday, July 12, 2022

MANILA, Philippines — Irresponsible parents will be compelled to give child support and be punished for skipping it if a lawmaker’s proposed measure becomes law.

ADVERTISEMENT

House Bill No. 44, filed on June 30, aims to mandate child support of not less than P6,000 and sanction neglectful parents by barring them from applying for new passports, drivers’ licenses, and other documents, according to its author, Northern Samar Rep. Paul Daza.

Under the bill, a parent who is required to pay child support but willfully fails to pay for two months or more than P30,000 will be held liable. In addition, first-time offenders will be subjected to probation, while repeat offenders may be imprisoned for two to four years and fined at least P100,000.

FEATURED STORIES

“In other countries, this is called the Anti-Deadbeat Father Act. In the case of parents here in the Philippines, 95 percent of neglectful parents are men, but there are also women. The bill is written not to be discriminatory. This is as responsible parenthood for fathers and mothers,” Daza, speaking in a mix of Filipino and English, explained during a press conference on Monday.

“If the parents are not responsible, the law will mandate that they give child support. That’s already in the law, but it’s not being enforced. So this bill will put more teeth in the law, and would even allow government agencies, once it’s established that you need to give child support that you’re not giving, the government can withhold issuance ng passports, driver’s license,” he added.

Even parents abroad who have left behind their families to fend for themselves cannot disregard the requirement should the bill be signed into law. The bill has a provision that would allow the government to coordinate with other countries in penalizing — or even extraditing — the violator.

“All of these will be discussed in the committee. As the principal author I’m open to improving the provision, but there is such a system,” he added.

Daza said he found the bill necessary as the World Health Organization (WHO) estimated in 2018 that around 14 million households in the Philippines only had one parent – about 95 percent of them female.

He also made clear in his bill’s explanatory note that, despite existing laws — like the Solo Parents Welfare Act and the  Violence Against Women and Children Act — there is still a need to help broken families cope with economic needs.

“For example, while RA 8972 [ Solo Parents Welfare Act] provides special privileges like discounts, leave credits, and flexible work schedule for solo parents, what these parents need more is an increase in their purchasing power, which can be done by compelling non-custodial parents to contribute toward their child’s basic necessities,” House Bill No. 44’s exploratory note states.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Seeing the important role of non-custodial or absentee spouses/partners in raising healthy and secure children, there is a need to enact a child support enforcement law. This proposed law will have more teeth than any other similar existing or proposed law,” it also says.

House Bill No. 44, Daza said, would also prevent the practice of solo parents skipping mediations due to aversions to legal proceedings as disputes can be settled within the Department of Social Welfare and Development.

And if parents don’t a good source of income, the government will help them find a job so they could meet their obligations.

Daza also clarified that under the bill, the provision of child aid is mandatory and not optional — even if the custodial parent or the person who chose to stay with the child would not want to receive money from the former partner.

RELATED STORY

DSWD chief warns negligent fathers

KGA/abc/atm
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: child, Family, Legislation, Parents, support
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.