Controversial cemetery | Inquirer News
cemetery, construction, demolition, floods, housing and urban planning, politics

Controversial cemetery

/ 08:03 AM June 19, 2011

I think Mayor Michael Rama and the Cebu City Council  should listen to the objections of residents of barangay Kalunasan to the proposed construction of a cemetery in the area. What is interesting is that the proposed cemetery is to be erected in the location of the Osmeña Shrine  because the lot was donated by Mayor Tommy Osmeña just before his term ended in May 2010. Many  residents are afraid their  water source would get  contaminated by human remains in a burial ground.  They also worried that a cemetery in the area would depress real estate prices there.  Another concern expressed by senior citizens was the prospect of losing the trees, which would be cut down when construction begins.

Rep. Tommy Osmeña disputed the claims of those who opposed the cemetery proposal with much research. But it is best for the  City Council to hear, listen and do what is best in the  situation considering that the proposed  donation for a cemetery was the idea of  the Bando Osmeña-Pundok Kauswagan (BO-PK) chief Tommy Osmeña. Let’s  wait for Mayor  Rama’s stand on the issue.

Some are  concerned because the proposed  donation for a multifaith  cemetery  was already approved  by the City Council  when  Rama was the vice mayor and presiding officer. Take note that the presiding officer   does not have to cast his vote, especially when there is a clear majority voting in favor of the matter. In this case, I reckon that when Rama was  presiding , the  majority of the council  already cast their votes in favor of the donation.  Well, things have changed and today Rama is no longer with the BO-PK or under Osmeña’s  leadership.

Article continues after this advertisement

I think Rama will make an independent  decision on the  Kalunasan situation.  The latest is that Congressman Osmeña is  thinking of allowing a columbary or bone chamber to be built there instead  of a cemetery. In the end, what the people want  will have to be recognized by the city government.

FEATURED STORIES

* * *

First-time Congressman Luigi Quisumbing said  he would  file a bill for the declaration of the lone district of Mandaue City contrary to the position taken by his camp  in the One Cebu party. Does it mean  that Quisumbing is giving more weight to the group of Mayor Jonas Cortes than that of One Cebu  headed by Gov. Gwen Garcia?  I think Quisumbing is giving more weight to the wishes of his constituents from Mandaue City than the party. It is a difficult political balancing act for Quisumbing but I guess he came up with the  option most politically favorable for him. It  won’t be  easy to fight Mayor Cortes on this issue  but it is easy to appease the One Cebu may be the  thinking of Quisumbing.  Besides, there are no strong political leaders in Mandaue City except for Quisumbing and Cortes.

Article continues after this advertisement

Now comes  the move of the Mandaue City treasurer to collect business taxes from the operation of the  Cebu International Convention Center (CICC)  would eventually tax the province of Cebu, which runs it.

Article continues after this advertisement

I hope that the issue can be resolved peacefully between the two parties instead of  driving a wedge that would destroy their relations.

Article continues after this advertisement

* * *

Residents   living  within the three-meter easement of the Mahiga Creek should realize that the demolitions ordered by Mayor  Rama is for their own good.  Now that the is rainy season has started,  Rama’s action protects  them from the risk of flooding.

Article continues after this advertisement

Residents who insist on staying near or above the creek  should not be encouraged by anyone because ultimately this arrangement  endangers the lives of residents, especially  children. The clearing of the  Mahiga Creek would also help the water level in flooded streets  subside  because one of the causes of flooding in the  city is  the lack of exits for rainwater  to drain when creeks and rivers are already occupied by men.

I think illegal settlers have to give up because it is for the interest and welfare of everybody in the city,  no matter how they justify their stay by the  river.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: THINK BITS

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.