Tiangco’s testimony not related to articles of impeachment—Tupas | Inquirer News

Tiangco’s testimony not related to articles of impeachment—Tupas

By: - NewsLab Lead / @MSantosINQ
/ 06:00 AM March 13, 2012

Niel Tupas Jr.

MANILA, Philippines—The testimony of the defense panel’s first witness had nothing to do with the articles 2, 3, and 7 of the impeachment complaint against Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato Corona, Iloilo Representative Niel Tupas Jr. said on Monday.

Navotas Representative Tobias Tiangco, testified on the alleged pressure that was used by allies of President Benigno Aquino III to get members of the House of Representatives to sign the impeachment complaint.

Article continues after this advertisement

“It’s not even related to the articles that were dropped,” Tupas said.

FEATURED STORIES

The prosecution chose to rest their case after presenting evidence on three articles. The Senate ruled on Monday that no further evidence would be accepted on articles 1, 4, 5, 6, and 8, and that they would no longer render a decision on those articles.

Tupas reiterated that nothing new came out of Tiangco’s testimony because the issue of the validity of the verified impeachment complaint had already been decided upon with finality by the impeachment court.

Article continues after this advertisement

Diverting public attention

Article continues after this advertisement

The defense panel wants to have congressmen who are part of the prosecution team to testify “to divert the attention of the public,” said prosecution spokesman, Marikina Representative Romero Quimbo.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Instead of the Chief Justice on trial, let’s put Congress on trial. That is the tactic of the defense. The Senate will not bite into that and we will object to that,” Quimbo said.

Quezon Representative Lorenzo Tañada, meanwhile, said that the defense should go straight ahead in presenting their witnesses on articles 2, 3, and 7.

Article continues after this advertisement

Quimbo reiterated that the defense was just trying to “create a side show” by asking the congressmen to testify.

“In trial, if you have no evidence on defense, you drag the trial and put somebody else on the stand,” Quimbo said. “That’s what they’re doing.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Congress, Judiciary, Renato Corona, Senate, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.