Lawyer cited for contempt for playing deaf to senator’s tirades | Inquirer News

Lawyer cited for contempt for playing deaf to senator’s tirades

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 08:13 PM February 29, 2012

Private prosecutor Vitaliano Aguirre covers his ears as a disgusted Sen. Miriam Defensor Santiago scolds the prosecution team at the impeachment trial Wednesday. PHOTOS BY EDWARD GANAL, BERNANRD TESTA/INTERAKSIYON.COM / SENATE POOL

MANILA, Philippines – Tension momentarily gripped the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona when Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago let out a mouthful against the prosecution for dropping some of its charges against the chief justice and then claiming victory after even while the trial was ongoing.

“That’s contempt of court…The arrogance of those who speak like that. How foolish. My goodness,” Santiago said in Filipino.


Added to this was when one of the prosecution lawyers, Vitaliano Aguirre, was caught on television covering his ears while Santiago was lecturing to the prosecution.

But the Senate, acting as an impeachment court, failed to take notice of Aguirre’s action until Senator Jose “Jinggoy” Estrada pointed this out and informed the chamber about the video that caught Aguirre in the act.


Estrada then called Aguirre on the floor and confronted him, telling the private prosecutor that what he did was disrespectful to a member of the impeachment court.

“Totoo po yun pagkat nasasaktan na ang teynga ko [That’s true because my ears are hurting],” Aguirre answered.

At that point, Santiago stood up to make a point of order.

“I charge this private prosecutor with complaint of this impeachment court. I have the evidence right here…a video by Senator Alan Cayetano. And to say that nasasaktan ang tenga ko [my ears were hurting], should have been cause for you to walk out of this courtroom with permission of the court,” said the senator.

But Enrile, before acting on Santiago’s motion, gave the private prosecutor a chance to explain himself.

Aguirre said he was offended when Santiago lectured to the lawyers like him but could not manifest it in court because he has yet to be recognized to be allowed to speak.

Not satisfied by the explanation, Santiago moved to cite Aguirre for contempt.


“Kasi nga, salungat sa gusto mo kaya aya mong pakinggan. E kung ayaw mong pakinggan e di umalis ka sa korte [It is because this isn’t what you want that’s why you don’t want to listen],” said the senator.

“Aalis na nga po sana ako e kaya lang [I would have wanted to leave, it’s just that]…” Aguirre said, but was immediately cut by Santiago who said, “Granted. If that’s in the form of a motion, go ahead. Nanghahamon ka ah [You are challenging me].

Enrile interrupted the exchange and appealed for calm.

But Aguirre went on and justified his action and even admitted covering his ears on purpose.

“I did it purposely kasi totoo naman po na shrill ang voice na nasasaktan ang tenga ko [because it’s true that her voice is shrill and my ears are hurting],” he said, adding that if the senator-judges want to be respected, they should also respect the prosecutors.

“Yung [This] human dignity, wala pong katulad yan [there’s no comparison],” Aguirre added, in which Santiago responded, “Now you’re lecturing me.”

Enrile immediately suspended the trial and when it resumed, Senator Pia Cayetano seconded Santiago’s motion.

Cayetano even asked the Senate to also exclude the private prosecutor from participating in the impeachment trial.

Enrile then ruled in favor of Santiago’s motion to which no member objected to.

“There’s a motion to cite a member of the prosecution panel for contempt and that motion is duly seconded and it can’t be set aside,” he said.

“Indeed, the person concerned was given a chance to explain what he did and why he did it and he openly admitted in court that he did it purposely because he felt offended and therefore it’s a sign of disrespect to a member in this court and that can’t be allowed to pass and must be dealt with according to the rules,” said the Senate leader.

“If there’s no objection to the motion of the lady senator from Iloilo, seconded by senator from Taguig…the gentleman who is a private member of the prosecution panel is hereby cited for contempt and the penalty that will be meted by this court will be taken up in a caucus by this court next week,” Enrile added.

The private prosecutor, under the rules, may face a penalty of not more than P2,000 and an imprisonment of not more than 10 days or both.

Before the incident with Aguirre, Ilocos Norte Representative Rodolfo Farinas of the prosecution team stood up on the floor to move that the word “gago” (foolish) used by Santiago in her speech be stricken out of the record, which Enrile, immediately granted.

Santiago herself made no objection to Farinas motion.

Santiago even provided comic relief in the trial when she requested the chamber to keep her expression “waah!” on record as she slammed the prosecution’s decision to drop some of the articles of impeachment against Corona.

“This is a travesty! Ang sabi nyo, malakas na malakas ang ebidenysa nya kasi eight ang articles of impeachment. Bilangin mo, walo yun. Pagkatapos ng dalawang buwan pa lang , ah wala na. Tatlo na lang…kasi tama na yun panalo na kami [You said that your evidence was strong because you have eight articles of impeachment. Count it. That’s eight. And after only two months, they’re gone. And we’re down to three… That’s enough because we’ve already won]. Waaah!” she said, eliciting laughter from the crowd in the gallery.

“I request the secretariat should record in our journal that I said waaah!” she said, making the crowd to laugh uncontrollably that Enrile had to bang his gavel several times.

“Silence please, silence,” said Enrile.

But this did not stop Majority Leader Vicente Sotto III from joining the fun when he stood up and said, “Thank you, Mr. President, Senator (Serge) Osmena is asking what’s the spelling of waah?”

Enrile willingly answered Sotto, saying “waaah!” was just an expression.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Chief Justice Renato Corona, Corona Impeachment, Impeachment court, impeachment trial, Miriam Defensor-Santiago, Prosecution, Vitaliano Aguirre
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2021 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.