Manila RTC tells Aquino, gov’t officials not to discuss pending cases in public | Inquirer News

Manila RTC tells Aquino, gov’t officials not to discuss pending cases in public

By: - Reporter / @T2TupasINQ
/ 08:57 PM February 20, 2012

MANILA, Philippines—The Manila Regional Trial Court Branch 8 on Monday cautioned government officials from discussing pending cases as it could “influence in the administration of justice.”

The reminder was included in the order issuing a preliminary injunction against the Department of Justice (DoJ) from further investigating former National Bureau of Investigation Director Magtanggol Gatdula.

While it did not directly give caution to President Benigno Aquino III, the Manila Court’s order included a transcript of the event in La Consolacion where he mentioned about the NBI case.

Article continues after this advertisement

“How will this affect your reform agenda in making corrupt officials accountable to their misdeeds…extremely difficult if not impossible. Alam nyo binigyan ko kayo ng sample andito si Secretary Leila De Lima. Naalala ko tuloy, may akusasyon laban sa mga opisyal ng NBI diba nakakuha sila ng TRO (I gave you an example. Secretary Leila de Lima is here. Now I remember, there is an accusation against officials of the NBI. They got a TRO, right?)” the Manila Court quoted Aquino’s transcript.

FEATURED STORIES

“xxx Ito ang gusto ko lang i-highlight, may katiwalian, may obligasyon na iayos itong NBI tapos sasabihan kang di kayo pwedeng kumilos. Anong klaseng hustisya yon? (This is what I want to highlight, there is an anomaly, there is an obligation to fix the NBI then they will tell us we can’t do anything about it),” the Manila Court further quoted the President.

“Although the prosecutors are not judges nor jurors, as contemplated by the subjudice rule, their recommendation is penal in nature and may throw petitioner in jail while waiting trial,” the Manila Court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The cautionary principle underlying the subjudice rule where it simply restrain the use of pronouncement in media because of the said public pronouncement suffer in completeness and the prosecutor-jurors seldom see more than a fraction of alleged violation without rebuttal of respondent in an investigation conducted by a panel,” the court said.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Manila Court, in its order, granted Gatdula’s prayer for preliminary injunction.

Article continues after this advertisement

It also restrained the DoJ “from doing, threatening, procuring or suffering to be done acts or transactions which are detrimental or prejudicial to the interest of the petitioner.”

The order was issued after the lapse of the 20-day temporary restraining order issued by the court. The injunction will stay until lifted by the court or until the case was resolved by the court.

Article continues after this advertisement

Gatdula filed an urgent petition for certiorari and prohibition before the Manila Court after he was dismissed as NBI head and was recommended to be subjected to a preliminary investigation for kidnapping and serious illegal detention.

The panel of investigators recommended that Gatdula be held liable for kidnapping with serious illegal detention for the abduction of Japanese national Noriyo Ohara.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: pending cases

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.