Venezuelan mayor marks homes of COVID-19 patients with red symbol

People walk behind a yellow tape reading “Danger do not pass” blocking a street to prevent people from going to a nearby market, amid a spike in infections of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) that has led the government to extend lockdown measures, in Caracas, Venezuela April 6, 2021. REUTERS/Leonardo Fernandez Viloria

BARQUISIMETO, Venezuela — A mayor in central Venezuela has begun placing red warning symbols on the homes of people with COVID-19 and also threatened to cut welfare handouts for those breaking quarantine.

“We are protecting our people,” said Luis Duque, the mayor of Sucre municipality in Yaracuy state, pointing to a white paper sign on a home with a red circle and line drawn through.

“This indicates that there is a Covid case or a suspected Covid case, so the people are alert,” he added in a video posted this week to his Instagram account.

Telling local radio that radical measures were needed as Venezuela tackled a second wave of the coronavirus, Duque said benefits including food handouts and cooking gas could be cut if people did not comply with quarantine orders.

The move by Duque, a member of President Nicolas Maduro’s ruling Socialist Party, brought accusations of discrimination.

“We must denounce him, and furthermore wish him good health so that he does not have to mark himself,” tweeted Tamara Suju, a human rights lawyer.

The South American country is experiencing a resurgence of the virus after a first peak last August, with 1,526 new cases and 15 deaths reported on Tuesday.

Yaracuy reported 186 new cases on Tuesday, fourth among the 23 states and the capital district, official data show.

Duque said his municipality would also fine anyone disobeying quarantine the equivalent of $9, several months’ worth of minimum wage salary in hyperinflationary Venezuela.

Neither Venezuela’s information ministry nor Duque responded to requests for comment from Reuters. He told local radio that if anyone considered the measures unconstitutional then they could challenge them in court, but that the rules were obligatory until any potential ruling against them.