Singapore blogger ordered to pay $100,000 for defaming PM | Inquirer News

Singapore blogger ordered to pay $100,000 for defaming PM

/ 03:32 PM March 24, 2021

Singapore blogger ordered to pay $100,000 for defaming PM

(FILE PHOTO) PM Lee said Singapore is in the process of evaluating China’s Sinovac vaccine. Photo by MCI

SINGAPORE A Singaporean blogger was ordered Wednesday to pay almost $100,000 in damages for defaming the prime minister by sharing an article on Facebook linking the leader to a corruption scandal.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had accused Leong Sze Hian of spreading false claims about him over the article related to the money-laundering scandal at state fund 1MDB in Malaysia.

Article continues after this advertisement

Critics say the case is the latest example of the tightly-regulated city-state’s government being heavy-handed and seeking to silence dissent online.

FEATURED STORIES

Singapore’s leaders have frequently turned to the courts to take on critics, ranging from political opponents to foreign media outlets, and insist such action is necessary to protect their reputations.

High Court Judge Aedit Abdullah found in Lee’s favor and ordered Leong to pay him Sg$133,000 (US$99,000). Lee had sought Sg$150,000.

Article continues after this advertisement

Leong’s lawyer Lim Tean described the verdict as a “wrong and deeply flawed decision.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The premier took the stand at the start of the trial in October and accused Leong of making “malicious and baseless” allegations, which had undermined the government’s “integrity and honesty.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The article that Leong shared, originally published in a Malaysian news portal, alleged that Lee was the target of an investigation in neighboring Malaysia over the 1MDB state fund.

Billions of dollars were looted from the investment vehicle in a scandal that involved Malaysia’s former leader Najib Razak and his inner circle.

Article continues after this advertisement

Leong’s lawyer Lim had argued the libel suit was unnecessary as authorities had already denied the allegations, adding the prime minister had “picked on the defendant when there are many others” who had shared the defamatory article.

Rights groups frequently accuse Singapore authorities of resorting to tough laws to silence criticism.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In 2019, authorities introduced a law against online misinformation, which empowers ministers to order the blocking of social media posts they deem false, sparking criticism that it would chill free speech.

TAGS: 1MDB, blogger, court, defamation, Politics, rights, Singapore

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.