SC prodded anew to temporarily halt anti-terror law implementation | Inquirer News

SC prodded anew to temporarily halt anti-terror law implementation

/ 09:54 PM February 16, 2021

MANILA, Philippines — Petitioners against the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) of 2020 have urged the Supreme Court (SC) once again to temporarily stop the law’s implementation, citing supervening events including the recent arrest of one of the petitioners and threats of prosecution by members of the military.

“Your honors, for the first time in history, petitioners and their counsels before this Honorable court are seriously threatened with prosecution under the challenged statute by no less than a military general who is part of the State, enforcing the controverted ATA,” one of the oralists, Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman, told the SC before the third Tuesday of oral arguments adjourned.

According to him, one of the petitioners, Chad Booc, was among those arrested by the police in the University of San Carlos, Cebu City, on Monday.


“All of this would underscore the chilling effect of the ATA, which cows citizens into silence and are restrained or precluded from exercising their freedom of expression,” he added.


While Lagman did not mention the specific threat, retired Supreme Court Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio and retired Supreme Court Associate Justice Conchita Carpio-Morales already raised before the high court the alleged threats made by Lt. General Antonio Parlade, spokesperson of the controversial National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC), via his Facebook post.

In a Facebook post on January 16, Parlade, who is also chief of the military’s Southern Luzon Command, called on the public to be “watchful of these individuals, groups, and organizations opposing a law that will protect our citizens from terrorists.”

“The Day of Judgment is upon you and the Filipino people, who have suffered enough from the malignant hands of the [communists], sit in judgment,” his post reads.

“Very soon, blood debts will be settled. The long arm of the law will catch up on you and your supporters,” warns the general in his social media post.

READ: 2 former Supreme Court justices push back vs Parlade threats

The two magistrates made the same manifestation before the SC after Parlade hinted of prosecuting an reporter for “aiding the terrorist.”


READ: 2 ex-justices score Parlade anew at SC

Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta has ordered Lagman to put in writing the manifestation and furnish the Office of the Solicitor General (OSG) for comment.

Solicitor General Jose Calida, however, implied they may ask for more time to comment on the matter.

But Peralta said the OSG has 10 days to comment.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The continuation of the oral arguments on ATA of 2020 is set for February 23.

TAGS: ATA, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.