Why the 2 Aetas quit joining the anti-terror law challengers | Inquirer News
Close  

Why the 2 Aetas quit joining the anti-terror law challengers

/ 10:07 PM February 09, 2021

MANILA, Philippines – The two Aetas who accused the military of torture said they signed “with full hesitation and out of sheer annoyance” the document from the National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL).

Solicitor-General Jose Calida mentioned japer Gurung and Junior Ramos’ joint-affidavit during the oral argument continuation.

ADVERTISEMENT

The two are currently in detention undergoing trial for violation of the Anti-Terror Act of 2020 and Illegal Possession of Ammunitions before the Olongapo City Regional Trial Court Branch 97.

According to the two, they signed the petition-in-intervention last Jan. 30, 2021 without fully explaining to them its contents.

FEATURED STORIES

“Pabalik-balik sila kaya nakulitan na kami kaya napilitan na kaming pumirma [They kept on coming back and it was annoying so we signed [the document],” the two said in their affidavit.

Gurung said initially, he does not want to talk to the lawyers until he heard them talking to Ramos saying “bakit di nakikipag-usap kasama mo. Kung ayaw niyang tumulong hayaan mo di namin siya tutulungan, mabulok sya sa bilangguan. [Why is your companion not talking to us. If he does not want to help.]

Calida said, reading the affidavit before the Supreme Court that after signing the petition, they were given P1000 (P500) each.

The petition being referred in the joint affidavit was the intervention petition asking the Supreme Court that the two be allowed to join as a party to the Anti-Terrorism Case.

During last week’s oral argument, Associate Justice Marvic Leonen asked the petitioners if the court could already step in even if there is no actual case alleging injury because of the questioned law.

Actual case or controversy, meaning conflict is actual, not hypothetical, is a requirement for the Supreme Court to exercise judicial review power.

“Shouldn’t we wait for the actual case? Maybe the Aeta case is the actual case, maybe Rural Missionaries…But we have to see how the government reacts,” Leonen said.

ADVERTISEMENT

During the oral argument continuation, Chief Justice Diosdado Peralta announced that the intervention petition by Gurung and Ramos had been denied.

READ: SC denies petition of 2 Aetas seeking help vs anti-terror law

This is the second time Calida has presented an affidavit from supposed petitioners backing out from the case before the Supreme Court.

During the July 2019 oral argument on a writ of kalikasan case related to the West Philippine Sea, Calida has submitted affidavits of 22 fishermen saying they were not aware of the filing of a petition by the Integrated Bar of the Philippines.

RELATED STORIES

SolGen: Some fishermen withdraw petition to protect WPS

SC to parties in West PH Sea case: Don’t litigate case on social media

ac

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Aetas, Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, Oral argument, Supreme Court
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.