Bishops worried by new Charter Change talks | Inquirer News

Bishops worried by new Charter Change talks

By: - Reporter / @mj_uyINQ
/ 01:47 AM June 11, 2011

Catholic bishops yesterday reacted cagily to fresh talks about amending the Constitution, saying lawmakers might go beyond limiting changes to the charter’s economic provisions.

“Instead of calling for a charter-change, why not just amend its economic provisions?” suggested Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo in a phone interview with reporters yesterday.

The bishops were reacting to a disclosure by Senate President Juan Ponce Enrile on Thursday that he and Speaker Feliciano Belmonte had agreed in principle on the need for deliberations on the amendments to the Constitution at the resumption of Congress sessions next month.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Enrile emphasized that the charter-change debate must be limited to constitution provisions restricting foreign ownership of certain industries and exclude proposals to revise the political structure of the country.

FEATURED STORIES

Pabillo, chair of the Catholic bishops’ National Secretariat for Social Action, said he was worried that lawmakers pushing for a revision of the Constitution would go beyond their pronouncement that amendments would be confined to economic policies.

He proposed that lawmakers must talk only about amendments to the Constitution’s economic provisions to pave the way for needed reforms instead of moving for a total change of the Constitution.

Article continues after this advertisement

Caloocan Bishop Deogracias Iñiguez echoed Pabillo’s concern, but said he would like to look at the proposed revisions.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Let us follow what reasons they will put up and then let us weigh their relevance to the society,” said Iñiguez, also chair of the Catholic bishops’ Public Affairs Committee.

Article continues after this advertisement

For his part, Cotabato Bishop Jose Colin Bagaforo said he would favor charter-change only if lawmakers committed themselves to limiting revisions to the Constitution’s economic provisions.

“I favor it but only on agreed-upon issues such as those concerning the economic provisions… if not, then we should just go by the existing amendments process in Congress,” said Bagaforo in a separate interview yesterday.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Constitution, Government, Legislation, Politics

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.