'Thanks but no thanks,' says Sotto on Duterte offer to buy Pfizer jabs for senators | Inquirer News

‘Thanks but no thanks,’ says Sotto on Duterte offer to buy Pfizer jabs for senators

/ 01:07 PM January 19, 2021

'Thanks but no thanks,' says Sotto on Duterte offer to buy Pfizer jabs for senators

Senate President Vicente “Tito” Sotto lll. INQUIRER.NET FILE PHOTO/CATHY MIRANDA

MANILA, Philippines — “Thanks but no thanks.”

This was the response of Senate President Vicente Sotto III to an offer from President Rodrigo Duterte to order Pfizer vaccines for senators, as the former denied the lawmakers’ supposed preference for the jab developed by the American firm.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a speech aired late Monday, the president scorned some senators who are urging the government to prioritize the procurement of Pfizer’s vaccine.

FEATURED STORIES

“Tell him thanks but no thanks! I wonder what gave him the idea that the senators favor Pfizer?” Sotto told reporters in a Viber message.

“I asked Sen. [Christopher] ‘Bong’ Go yesterday after he made his pitch if the President is informed of what’s transpiring in our hearings. He (Go) said yes but apparently not!” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Over Twitter, Sotto said senators prefer “any vaccine” which are “correctly priced” and properly procured and distributed.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I wonder who gave [President Rodrigo Duterte] the wrong info that senators favor Pfizer? We do not! We favor any vaccine CORRECTLY PRICED! Properly procured n distributed!” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

During his speech, Duterte mentioned Sen. Risa Hontiveros, who earlier asked the government to ensure that the Philippines will be able to procure vaccines from Pfizer after it was able to secure an emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last Jan. 14.

READ: Poe to gov’t: Prioritize vaccine deal with Pfizer

Article continues after this advertisement

Senator Panfilo Lacson also denied that senators have a preference for Pfizer’s vaccine.

“I haven’t heard of any senator who has expressed preference for the Pfizer vaccine or any brand for that matter,” Lacson said in a separate message to reporters.

“What we are doing in the Senate is an exercise of our oversight over the appropriations laws that we passed particularly on the purchase of the vaccines,” he added.

Lacson reiterated there is no personal or political agenda involved in the Senate’s inquiry into the government’s Covid-19 vaccination plan.

“Most of us who participated in the public hearings of the [Committee of the Whole] merely want to get straightforward and honest responses from the concerned authorities so we will be informed for our future reference in our legislative work,” he said.

“Instead, the resource persons were groping, inconsistent, flip-flopping and even evasive in their responses – hence our misgivings and apprehensiveness,” he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The Senate is scheduled to resume its inquiry on the government’s COVID-19 vaccination drive on Friday, January 22.

KGA

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link.

TAGS: Coronavirus, COVID-19, Health, Nation, News, pandemic, Politics, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine, Virus

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.