Prosecution suggests dropping other charges vs Corona to shorten trial | Inquirer News
TO SHORTEN IMPEACH TRIAL

Prosecution suggests dropping other charges vs Corona to shorten trial

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 01:05 PM January 31, 2012

MANILA, Philippines—The prosecution team in the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona may drop other charges against him to shorten the proceeding, House Majority Floor Leader Neptali “Boyet” Gonzales said on Tuesday.

“It’s an option open to the prosecution to drop other charges…After all, you only need one to convict Chief Justice Corona,” Gonzales told reporters.

The impeachment complaint filed against Corona contained eight articles but the prosecution has so far presented only one of eight – Article 2 which pertains to Corona’s alleged failure to disclose his statement of asset, liabilities and net worth—since the trial began last January 16.

Article continues after this advertisement

After Article 2, the prosecution will proceed to Articles 3,7,1,8,4,5 and 6.

FEATURED STORIES

But Gonzales said the prosecution could just drop the last three or four articles and then allow the defense team to present their own witnesses.

He was confident that in Article 2 alone, the prosecution has a strong case against the Chief Justice.

Article continues after this advertisement

If the prosecution decides to drop the other charges, Gonzales estimated that Corona’s trial could be finished in just two months.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Maybe we can end the trial before the Lenten season,” he said. The Lenten season this year will be on the first week of April.

Article continues after this advertisement

A member of the prosecution team, Bayan Muna Representative Neri Colmenares, was open to dropping other charges if they have established their case against Corona.

“It has always been my position that at anytime the prosecution feels they have established their case, they have, of course, the right or the discretion to say that: This is it. We don’t want to waste the Senate’s time. We feel that we established our case so we can stop presenting our evidence,” said Colmenares.

Article continues after this advertisement

Like Gonzales, Colmenares believes the evidence in Article 2 was strong to convict Corona.

“I doubt very much if the Chief Justice would be able to explain it because there’s no other way to explain it para sa akin. Even if you claim allowances that’s still taxable,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Originally posted at 12:48 pm | Tuesday, January 31, 2012

TAGS: Corona impeachment trial

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.