Lawmakers still wary of legalizing marijuana | Inquirer News

Lawmakers still wary of legalizing marijuana

MANILA, Philippines — Lawmakers remained wary of legalizing cannabis use in the country even after the United Nations Commission on Narcotic Drugs (CND) downgraded the classification of marijuana.

Several senators and congressmen were skeptical that the CND’s decision to reclassify marijuana from Schedule IV (most dangerous) to Schedule I (least dangerous) would have an impact on the country’s narcotics laws.

Senate President Vicente Sotto III quickly shot down notions that the UN action would result in changes in Philippine laws, particularly the legalization of marijuana use.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Firstly, it was a 27-25 vote and only to move it from Schedule IV to Schedule I. That’s not decriminalizing,” Sotto said.

FEATURED STORIES

On the contrary, the CND’s move indicated that while marijuana may be less dangerous than morphine, heroin and cocaine (Schedule IV), it still remained in the schedule of dangerous drugs.

“It only means there could be medical derivatives, like opium, but still risky,” he said, referring to ongoing research on cannabidiol—a nonintoxicating compound—which increased its role in wellness therapies in recent years, and sparked a billion-dollar industry.

The House of Representatives approved earlier this year a bill allowing the use of marijuana for medical purposes, but the bill has yet to be tackled in the Senate.

Sen. Joel Villanueva said that while he was open to discussions on medical marijuana, he still harbors doubts.

“Our reservation stems primarily on the capacity of our government agencies to regulate its use,” Villanueva said. “Just like any other drug, it can be subjected to abuse.”

Anakalusugan Rep. Mike Defensor, vice chair of the House dangerous drugs committee, warned that criminals may be given a “legal cover for drug pushing” if marijuana production is allowed.

ADVERTISEMENT

Quezon Rep. Angelina Tan, on the other hand, welcomed the reclassification of marijuana but stressed that it “must only be used for medical purposes.”

—With a report from Patricia Denise M. Chiu

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.