Red-tagging probe turning into he said, she said affair | Inquirer News

Red-tagging probe turning into he said, she said affair

/ 08:18 PM November 24, 2020

PHOTO FROM AFP PAO

MANILA, Philippines—An investigation into red-tagging is turning into a he said, she said affair after a top security official of the Duterte administration insisted he knew that communist guerrillas were maintaining legal fronts while those he had painted as communist leaders maintained that their activism has no link whatsoever with the communist rebellion in the countryside.

Speaking to reporters after attending a Senate hearing on red-tagging operations allegedly by the military, National Security Adviser Hermogenes Esperon Jr. on Tuesday (Nov. 24) insisted that the National Democratic Front of the Philippines (NDFP), the Communist Party of the Philippines (CPP) and its armed wing, New People’s Army (NPA), was maintaining what he described as legal fronts.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I must say that the greatest trick of the CPP-NPA-NDF is to convince us that it does not exist,” said Esperon, armed forces chief of former President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. “But we know they do this through the use of underground movements or underground mass organizations that control the open or front organizations,” said Esperon in a talk with reporters after attending the Senate hearing.

FEATURED STORIES

At the hearing, known activists and leftist leaders faced the Senate after skipping the first hearing earlier this month. They were Neri Colmenares, Bayan Muna chair; Carlos Zarate, Bayan Muna representative in the House; Sarah Elago, Kabataan party-list representative and Teddy Casino, former Bayan Muna representative.

Zarate sought to rebut claims that Bayan Muna was a front of the CPP.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the group is a “legitimate party that believes in parliamentary struggle to push for reforms and changes in society.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Casiño said he does not consider NPA an enemy even if the guerrillas seemed to be committing an “illegal act.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Just like we don’t consider the members of the MILF or the MNLF as enemies, we also do not consider the members of the CPP-NPA-NDF as enemies,” said Casino during the hearing.

“They are revolutionary groups. We may not agree with their program, we may not agree with the way that they are pushing for their agenda but our attitude toward them is engage,” Casino said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Zarate said it would be difficult to condemn people who took up arms in search for justice “because I believe that there’s a social reason for that.”

“Outrightly condemning them is akin to denying the existence of the roots of the armed conflict in our country,” Zarate said. “Condemning them would only shut the doors for political settlement,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But Esperon said the CPP-NPA-NDF “has succeeded in no small amount in concealing its conspiracy and have its cadres or personalities supporting, masquerading as patriots or freedom fighters or human rights advocates.”

Edited by TSB
TAGS: Activists, Bayan Muna, Esperon, guerrillas, Insurgency, leftists, rebels, red-tagging, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.