Martires defends move to stop weaponizing SALN vs gov’t officials
MANILA, Philippines — Ombudsman Samuel Martires on Tuesday defended the restriction of public access to officials’ Statements of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN), saying that this has been weaponized against government officials.
He made the remark during the deliberations on the budget of the Office of the Ombudsman in the House of Representatives.
“Sa experience ng Ombdusman, naging weapon po ang SALN. Ginamit po ito na means para siraan ang isang tao, o siraan ang isang kalaban sa pulitika,” he said.
(According to the experience of the Ombudsman, SALN has been weaponized. It is being used as means to damage the reputation of a person, or besmirch a rival in politics.)
Martires said the government must “restudy the form of SALN” because it is being used by opponents of government officials, but is rooted in the “vague law” and a “vague system.”
“We have to restudy the form of this SALN kasi ang ginagamit palagi na armas ng mga kalaban sa pulitika o mga galit sa kawani ng gobyerno, para ika’y makasuhan,” he said.
“Subalit ang may kagagawan ng kasalanang ito, ang pinagmulan ng kasalanang ito, ay ang malabong batas. Ang malabong sistema, form ng SALN,” Martires added.
(But the root cause of all of these, all of these started because of a vague law. The vague system, form of SALN.)
The Office of the Ombudsman has issued new guidelines on who can request copies of a government official’s Statement of Assets, Liabilities, and Net Worth (SALN), limiting it to the declarant and for officers conducting investigations.
According to the Memorandum Circular No. 1 signed by Ombudsman Samuel Martires, this move is in accordance with the Implementing Rules and Regulations of Republic Act No. 6713 of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees.
Under this memorandum dated September 1, SALNs would now be released only in three situations:
• if the declarant, meaning the government official who filed it and his or her official representative made a request;
• if it is legally ordered by the court in relation to a pending case
• if the request is made through the Office of the Ombudsman’s field investigation office for the purpose of a fact-finding probe
Subscribe to our daily newsletter
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.