'Masalimuot na debate': Senate, House wrangle over P10B aid for tourism | Inquirer News

‘Masalimuot na debate’: Senate, House wrangle over P10B aid for tourism

/ 10:44 AM August 20, 2020

Second meeting of the bicameral conference committee on the disagreeing provisions of the proposed Bayanihan to Recover as One Act or Bayanihan 2 on Monday, August 17, 2020. Photo courtesy of Sen. Sonny Angara’s office.

MANILA, Philippines — The Senate and the House of Representatives are still debating on how to allocate the P10-billion tourism assistance under the proposed Bayanihan to Recover as One Act or the Bayanihan 2 bill, Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon said.

The Senate is pushing for the allocation of the P10 billion to tourism enterprises but the House wants the funding to go to tourism infrastructure, according to Drilon.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Iyan po ang masalimuot na debate. Ang version ng Senado ay P10 billion para sa mga nahirapang kumpanya doon sa tourism enterprises. Subalit ang initial position ng House of Representatives ay yung P10 billion ay gagamitin sa kalsada at infrastructure para sa tourism areas,” he said in an interview over  Teleradyo on Thursday.

FEATURED STORIES

(That is a complicated debate. The version of the Senate is that P10 billion will be allocated for the assistance to tourism enterprises. However, the position of the House of Representatives is to use the P10 billion to build roads and infrastructure for tourism areas.)

“Hindi namin ma-resolve ay yung P10 billion na gusto natin ibigay as stimulus at tulong para sa tourism enterprises pero ang gusto ng House of Representatives ay gawing kalsada,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

(We cannot resolve it because senators want the P10 billion to act as a stimulus and assistance for the tourism enterprises but the House of Representatives wants funding for roads.)

Article continues after this advertisement

Senators and House lawmakers are currently reconciling the disagreeing provisions of their respective versions of the Bayanihan 2 measure through a bicameral conference committee, which Drilon is a member of.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Bayanihan 2 bill, seen to replace the expired Bayanihan to Heal as One Act, lays out for the country’s COVID-19 response and recovery plan and allocates funds to help struggling sectors cope up with the impacts of the coronavirus pandemic.

Members of the committee had already earlier agreed on a P162-billion funding. However, only P140 billion will be readily available.

Article continues after this advertisement

Once Congress ratifies the reconciled measure, it will be transmitted to President Rodrigo Duterte for his signature.

According to Drilon, House lawmakers have been insisting that the P10 billion under the measure be given to the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA)

But the Senate was not amenable to that, he said.

“Pinipilit nila na dapat ito ay ilagay sa TIEZA pero hindi pumapayag ang Senado,” Drilon said, pointing out that it is the businesses under the tourism sector that needs assistance from the government in terms of loans.

(They are insisting that we lodge all of that funding under TIEZA but the Senate does not want to.)

“Sila ang tinamaan nang husto dahil walang domestic tourism. Ngunit ang version ng House of Representatives ay ito ay infrastructure, hindi po kami pumayag kasi para sa  amin hindi naman kailangan sa panahong ito ng infrastructure. Ang kailangan dahil naghihingalo ay yung mga loans para sa kumpanya,” the Senate minority leader added.

(They are the ones really affected by the pandemic because there is no domestic tourism. But the House of Representatives wants money for infrastructure, we did not allow that because we don’t need infrastructure right now. What we need is to help this struggling sector in terms of loans.)

Senators , Drilon said, tried to compromise with the proposal of the lower chamber by suggesting that out of the P10 billion, P1 billion will be given to TIEZA, P3 billion to aid displaced workers and P6 billion for the loan assistance to tourism enterprises.

But the House still insisted on putting all of the P10 billion to TIEZA, according to Drilon.

“Iyan ang suggested compromise. Akala ko nagkasundo na pero pagbalik kahapon, hindi na naman… Hanggang ngayon hindi pa kami nagkakasundo,” he said.

(That is the suggested compromise. I thought we could finally agree to that but when we met yesterday again, it turns out we still won’t… Until now we haven’t arrived at an agreement yet.)

“Hanggang ngayon hindi pa kami nagkakasundo. Yung pondo na iyon isa pa sa mga bagay as of last night na wala pang kasunduan,” he said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Senators earlier said the bicameral discussions on the Bayanihan 2 are expected to wrap up on Thursday, with the Senate ratifying the reconciled measure in the afternoon.

EDV
TAGS: Bayanihan 2, Nation, News, Tourism

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.