Close  

SC sets September oral argument for petitions vs anti-terror law

/ 03:07 PM August 11, 2020

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court will conduct an oral argument on the petitions assailing the constitutionality of Republic Act 11479 or the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

“The Supreme Court will be conducting oral arguments on the third week of September, at the earliest. Proper notices will be issued once the date is finalized,” SC Public Information Office Chief and Spokesperson Atty. Brian Keith Hosaka said Tuesday.

ADVERTISEMENT

At the same time, he said the six new petitions filed recently has been consolidated with the previous petitions.

“The Supreme Court in today’s En Banc meeting has ordered the consolidation of the 6 latest petitions on the Anti Terrorism Act (RA 11479) with that of the 19 petitions earlier filed before the Supreme Court, and has likewise ordered the respondents to file their comments to the 6 new petitions within a period of 10 days,” Hosaka said.

FEATURED STORIES

Officially, there are 25 petitions filed before the Supreme Court. The two other petitions from Mindanao have yet to reach the high court.

Most of the petitions are also asking the Supreme Court to issue a restraining order on the implementation of the law and the drafting of the Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR).

The highly contested provisions of the law are the following:

• section 4 – definition of Terrorism;
• section 5 – the threat to commit terrorism;
• section 6 – planning, training, preparing and facilitating the commission of terrorism;
• section 9 – inciting to commit terrorism;
• section 10 – recruitment to and membership in a terrorist organization;
• section 11 – foreign terrorist;
• section 12 – providing material support to terrorists.
• section 25 – designation of terrorist individual, groups of persons, organizations or associations;
• section 26 – proscription of terrorist organizations, associations or group of persons;
• section 27 – preliminary order of proscription
• section 29 – detention without judicial warrant of arrest

[ac]

RELATED STORIES:

Solgen replies to petitions vs anti-terrorism law

ADVERTISEMENT

Lawyers, journalists, activists file 27th petition vs terror law

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, RA 11479, Supreme Court, Terrorism, terrorist
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.