DOH won’t ban use of rapid antibody tests | Inquirer News
NO RESTRICTION

DOH won’t ban use of rapid antibody tests

By: - Reporter / @jovicyeeINQ
/ 04:34 AM August 11, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — Despite the medical community’s call to ban the use of rapid antibody test kits, the Department of Health (DOH) isn’t keen on imposing a restriction, stressing that this can still be used to check if patients have already recovered from the coronavirus disease (COVID-19).

Health Undersecretary Maria Rosario Vergeire reiterated on Monday that the rapid test kits should not be used to screen patients for COVID-19 but only to see if one has already developed antibodies against the severe respiratory disease.

“There’s no need to ban it since it still has its use in our response. We can use the rapid antibody test on those patients who are already recovering or can already be tagged as recovered,” Vergeire said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is because on the 21st day of illness, the kit is accurate and sensitive already to show if one has developed IgG (immunoglobulin G), the antibody which indicates that the patient has already recovered,” she added.

Earlier, the medical community blamed the local governments’ and the business sector’s inappropriate use of rapid test kits to screen their employees for COVID-19 for the surge in cases. They pointed out that this might have helped drive up infection “because rapid tests miss more than half of people with active, contagious illness.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: coronavirus Philippines, DoH

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.