2 lawyers ask SC to stop impeachment trial (again) | Inquirer News

2 lawyers ask SC to stop impeachment trial (again)

MANILA, Philippines—A third urgent motion has been filed in the Supreme Court for the issuance of a temporary restraining order (TRO) on the impeachment trial of Chief Justice Renato Corona.

In a three-page pleading, lawyers Homobono Adaza and Alan Paguia on Friday said the high court should intervene because some senator-judges were displaying “unseemly and partial behavior” and acting like “senator-prosecutors.”

They said Senators Franklin Drilon, Alan Peter Cayetano, Francis Pangilinan, Edgardo Angara, Aquilino Pimentel III, Jinggoy Estrada, Panfilo Lacson and Francis Escudero were “badgering witnesses just so the points which could not be achieved by the House prosecutors could be obtained.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Adaza and Paguia said there were compelling reasons for their pleading. “The Senate assuming jurisdiction on a mere scrap of paper and its continuance to proceed with the trial have led to serious misinterpretation of the provisions of the Constitution, resulting [in] distortions of the fundamental legal document, which should never be allowed to proliferate,” they said.

FEATURED STORIES

They said these “distortions” included the Senate’s decision to proceed with the trial despite the lack of verification of the articles of impeachment, the senators’ argument that the high court could not review the acts of the impeachment court, and the senators’ “disregard” of the provisions of the rules of court during the trial.

Why is defense participating?

Article continues after this advertisement

Paguia and Adaza’s latest pleading is related to the case they filed on Jan. 3, which asked the high court to stop the impeachment trial on the grounds of alleged defects in the articles of impeachment adopted by the House of Representatives.

Article continues after this advertisement

The original case was among the five similar cases consolidated on Tuesday by the high court, which gave the respondents—the Senate and the House—10 days to comment.

Article continues after this advertisement

In an interview with reporters, Adaza and Paguia accused the Senate of “wasting public funds” for continuing to hold a “questionable” impeachment trial.

“The people should not be misled. Only the Supreme Court can resolve this issue,” Paguia said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Paguia assailed Corona’s defense team for continuing to take part in the trial.

“I’m sad because they’re not questioning [the basis of the impeachment]. Why are they participating in this actively? It’s not the Senate that has the final word on this. It’s the Constitution, which only the Supreme Court can interpret,” Paguia said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Corona impeachment trial, Francis Escudero, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.