SONA 2020 ‘disappointing, frustrating’ to Albay solon as it ‘barely touched’ gov’t response on COVID-19 | Inquirer News
Close  

SONA 2020 ‘disappointing, frustrating’ to Albay solon as it ‘barely touched’ gov’t response on COVID-19

By: - Reporter / @DYGalvezINQ
/ 07:21 PM July 27, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — Albay Rep. Edcel Lagman on Monday said it was “disappointing” and “frustrating” that President Rodrigo Duterte “barely touched” in his fifth State of the Nation Address the administration’s response to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic in the country.

He added that the President only mentioned his endorsement to Congress of the Bayanihan to Recover As One Act, dubbed as the “Bayanihan 2” bill, which is a supplement measure to the Bayanihan to Heal as One Act.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I was expecting the President to make a pronouncement and discuss this administration’s roadmap in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and that was barely touched in his speech,” Lagman said in an interview over ABS-CBN News Channel.

Under the Bayanihan 2 measure, Filipinos would be provided with various forms of relief during the public health crisis, which include an emergency subsidy to displaced workers, cash-for-work programs, prevention and control of other diseases, support programs for impacted sectors, and support for the agricultural sector.

FEATURED STORIES

Lagman pointed out that the proposed P140 billion budget under the Bayanihan 2 is a “very miniscule amount” and “could not properly respond to the health and economic emergencies.”

Lagman said he was disappointed how President Duterte did not make a clear discussion of the administration’s stimulus package and make a detailed plan on possible funding sources.

“It was frustrating that he did not actually discuss the roadmap of how the country is going to respond to the pandemic and the people were expecting him to say this and nothing was said about it,” he added.

Threat to telcos

President Duterte warned telecommunication companies Smart and Globe of expropriation if they do not improve their services by December.

This warning, however, was only a “threatening rhetoric” used by Duterte against “perceived oligarchies,” Lagman said, as Duterte cannot take the law into his own hands.

Supposed violations or shortcomings of delivery of service should be brought to courts, he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think the President was just using his threatening rhetoric against his perceived oligarchies, and then he can’t take law in his own hands,” the Albay lawmaker said.

“If there are violations, any shortcomings in delivery of service of these utility companies, then these violations should be brought up before a court and it’s for the court to resolve whether there are violations and what punishment should be imposed,” he added.

He noted that such rhetoric is consistent with Duterte’s “populist pronouncements” which he said are “palatable” to the public. He added, however, that the Sona is not the proper venue or time to make such rhetoric.

“I think the Sona was not the proper venue or time to make these threatening rhetoric and populist statements but if there are violations then let proper judicial authorities make the necessary decisions and impose the corresponding penalties,” he said.

asu

For more news about the novel coronavirus click here.
What you need to know about Coronavirus.
For more information on COVID-19, call the DOH Hotline: (02) 86517800 local 1149/1150.

The Inquirer Foundation supports our healthcare frontliners and is still accepting cash donations to be deposited at Banco de Oro (BDO) current account #007960018860 or donate through PayMaya using this link .

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: COVID-19, disappointing, duterte, Lagman, response, Sona
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.