Palace says it’s up to Ombudsman to probe Midas Marquez on WB fund mess | Inquirer News

Palace says it’s up to Ombudsman to probe Midas Marquez on WB fund mess

/ 05:39 AM January 20, 2012

Supreme Court spokesperson Jose Midas Marquez INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

It would be up to the Ombudsman to investigate Supreme Court Administrator Jose Midas Marquez in connection with the alleged irregular use of millions of pesos earmarked for the World Bank-funded Judicial Reform Support Project (JRSP), Malacañang said Thursday.

Undersecretary Abigail Valte, President Benigno Aquino III’s deputy spokesperson, said the World Bank aide memoire on the alleged anomalies in the JRSP listed huge chunks of ineligible expenses incurred by the Office of the Court Administrator.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We have no hit list. We have an issue with how the funds from the World Bank loan were used as pointed out by the World Bank itself,” Valte said when asked if Marquez, the Supreme Court and Chief Justice Renato Corona’s spokesperson, was next on the administration list of targets for accountability.

FEATURED STORIES

Valte said the position of court administrator, although it carries with it the rank of a court justice, was not one of the posts that are subject to impeachment proceedings such as the one Corona is now facing in the Senate.

Asked which office had the mandate to investigate Marquez, Valte said, “That would be the Office of the Ombudsman.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Pressed if the administration would cause the Ombudsman to investigate Marquez, the deputy spokesperson said, “That will be up to their determination as an independent office.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Multiple positions

Article continues after this advertisement

Earlier on Thursday, Secretary Edwin Lacierda, President Aquino’s spokesperson, said the Supreme Court’s alleged mismanagement of a multimillion-peso World Bank loan was a blemish on the Philippines’ image abroad.

“The Supreme Court’s mismanagement of funds, including ineligible expenses approved by spokesperson and Court Administrator Marquez himself—serving as judge, jury and executioner in what is a conflict of interest in holding multiple positions, breaking down barriers that should serve as internal fiscal controls—redounds negatively to the whole country,” Lacierda said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said the administration was consistent in its policy of transparency, accountability and prudence in spending public funds. “This is something that we—and the rest of the Filipino people—expect not only from the executive branch, but also from all other independent, coequal branches of government,” he added.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Government, Judiciary, Supreme Court, World Bank

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.