Panelo ignores Manila Bishop's dare to sue CBCP over anti-terror law comments | Inquirer News

Panelo ignores Manila Bishop’s dare to sue CBCP over anti-terror law comments

/ 06:36 PM July 21, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — President Rodrigo Duterte’s chief legal counsel Salvador Panelo on Tuesday brushed aside the dare of Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo for him to file charges against the Catholic Bishops’ Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) over the group’s recent pastoral letter that raised objections to the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

According to Panelo, pursuing legal action against the clergy would only “give them the excuse to decry government suppression, silencing of voices, and weaponization of the law, similar to what detractors and critics recite when they are hailed to court for their transgressions.”

“It is amusing and disturbing to witness a bishop dare — or pose a challenge for — the government to file a case against them. The manner in which it was hurled seemed to demonstrate hubris and hate on his part,” Panelo said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We will simply shrug off such [a] challenge,” he added.

FEATURED STORIES

Pabillo’s dare stemmed from Panelo’s earlier remark that CBCP’s latest pastoral letter criticizing the controversial Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020,  “appears to have violated” the constitutional provision on the separation of the Church and the State.

The Palace official also accused CBCP of pressuring the Supreme Court in calling for prayers amid the recent signing of the highly controversial measure.

Article continues after this advertisement

Panelo claimed he did not categorically say that CBCP violated the Constitution and stressed that the government respects the right of members of the clergy to express their dissent on certain issues.

Article continues after this advertisement

Panelo added: “However, when members of their top ranks, collectively, in the name of their religion, exert pressure and influence on a purely governmental process by publicly posting a powerful rhetorical question such as: ‘Will the highest level of our Judiciary assert its independence, or will they, too, succumb to political pressure?’, they cross the line that separates the church and state.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Duterte signed Republic Act No. 11479, or the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, on July 3 despite massive opposition from various sectors over fears that it could be used as a potential state weapon against dissent.

Several petitions have already been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the new law.

KGA
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Church, Constitution, Philippines, State

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.