Close  

Bato on anti-terror law: ‘Why fear about possible abuse’

By: - Reporter / @MAgerINQ
/ 10:40 AM July 08, 2020
Sen. Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa

Sen. Ronald “Bato” Dela Rosa. Senate PRIB file photo / Albert Calvelo

MANILA, Philippines — “Why fear about the possible abuse?”

Former  police chief and now Senator Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa raised this question on Wednesday as he continued to defend the recently signed anti-terror  law.

ADVERTISEMENT

He even dared critics to cite at least one example of abuse by law enforcers when the old  Human Security Act of 2007 was  being enforced.

“After 15 years, can you cite to me an example na inabuso ng kapulisan at kasundaluhan yung (that the police and military abused the) Human Security Act? Hindi, so why fear?  Why fear about the possible abuse?” dela Rosa said in an interview over ABS-CBN News Channel’s Headstart.

FEATURED STORIES

“Ang mga pulis naman at sundalo ay takot din yang mawalan ng trabaho dahil mayroong mga safeguards na nakalagay sa batas na ito. Mas mabigat ang safeguards na nilagay ngayon dito,” he pointed out.

(The police and the military are also afraid to lose their job because there are safeguards here in this law. Stricter safeguards  have been provided here now)

The senator urged the public to believe the intent of the law based on the explanation of the authors of the law, instead  of listening to false interpretations of some people.

And to critics of the  law, Dela  Rosa had this to say, be “positive” or you  will always  have apprehensions if you always see the negative side.

He also reiterated that the new anti-terror law clearly states that the definition of terrorism does not cover advocacy, dissent, protest, work stoppage, and other similar exercise of civil and political rights.

“So kung magpapalabas ka ng dissent hindi ka pakikialaman, terorista ka na pala. Pag nagpalabas ka ng dissent, nag protesta ka, terorista  ka na pala.  Klaro man ang sinabi ng batas na yun, hindi kasama,” he stressed.

(So if you dissent or protest,  you will now be considered a terrorist?  The law is clear that that is not covered.)

ADVERTISEMENT

JPV
Read Next
EDITORS' PICK
MOST READ
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: abuse, anti-terror law, Legislation, Ronald “Bato” dela Rosa, Senate, Terrorism
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.